2015
DOI: 10.1080/10705422.2014.985411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practices of Engagement: Comparing and Integrating Deliberation and Organizing

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to provide a comparison of institution-based community organizing and deliberative practices and to demonstrate how these are complementary approaches for civic engagement. In contrast to older typologies describing these two approaches oppositionally, we seek to reveal a shared democratic ethos and propose greater collaboration between action-oriented organizers and deliberative advocates. The article also identifies where deliberative and organizing practices diverge and propos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coalition to save the HCSO and the work and perspectives of one of its key member organization, the CPA, provide an example of what Rusch and Swarts (2015) described as a melding of institution-based community organizing and "deliberative practice," both of which "are motivated by a belief in the necessity of democratic participation for legitimate policy outcomes" (p.13). As these authors further noted, "Both approaches to participation [institution-based community organizing and deliberative practice] are also, at their core, about supporting democratic social change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coalition to save the HCSO and the work and perspectives of one of its key member organization, the CPA, provide an example of what Rusch and Swarts (2015) described as a melding of institution-based community organizing and "deliberative practice," both of which "are motivated by a belief in the necessity of democratic participation for legitimate policy outcomes" (p.13). As these authors further noted, "Both approaches to participation [institution-based community organizing and deliberative practice] are also, at their core, about supporting democratic social change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban governments which ìin their strategies for the construction and consolidation of political territories... tend to promote settings or opportunities for collective action of an interactive, negotiated type.î Consultations and contracts can ìmove away from situations that block decision-makingî and present ìpossibilities for generating choices that will be more efficient because they have been made jointlyî (Bobbio, 2000;as cited in Pinson, 2002, p. 480). The strategic intervention links deliberative processes like study circles to organizing campaigns involving community mobilization (Rusch & Swarts, 2015). The strategic intervention can play several key roles.…”
Section: Creating or Deepening Network And Strategic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim will be to mobilise strategic interventions. These are Innovative way of utilising interventions to link deliberative processes like study circles and organising campaigns involving community mobilisation (Rusch & Swarts, 2015). The strategic intervention can play several key roles in promoting green universities and communities by addressing various potential barriers to action and social change.…”
Section: Knowledge Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%