Practice Patterns in Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Survey Data

Abstract

ObjectiveAlthough screening protocols for patients who present with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASNHL) exist, there are no clear guidelines to direct practitioners. In particular, various thresholds have been proposed for the degree of hearing loss that should prompt MRI studies, but the topic remains understudied. This project aims to compare protocols followed by practitioners to guide their imaging practices.Study DesignWeb‐based survey.SettingOtolaryngology faculty at academic medical centers.MethodsA list of 530 otolaryngologists (276 otology/neurotology specialists, 254 general otolaryngologists) was compiled. A survey consisting of three parts: demographics, general practice patterns, and simulated patient cases was distributed.ResultsA total of 468 surveys were successfully distributed, resulting in 88 (18.8%) responses. The majority of respondents (63.8%) self‐reported their definition of ASNHL as “>30 dB hearing asymmetry at one frequency OR >20 dB hearing asymmetry at two continuous frequencies OR >10 dB hearing asymmetry at three contiguous frequencies.” Overall, general otolaryngologists were more likely to observe asymmetric findings with serial audiogram alone, whereas otology/neurotology specialists were more likely to obtain imaging.ConclusionThere is significant variability between providers with regard to managing patients with ASNHL and evidence‐based guidelines would be useful in guiding imaging practices.Level of EvidenceN/A Laryngoscope, 2024