Background
Peripheral neuropathy is a common disorder in which an extensive evaluation is often unrevealing. We sought to define diagnostic practice patterns as an early step in identifying opportunities to improve efficiency of care.
Methods
The 1996–2007 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) - Medicare Claims linked database was used to identify individuals with an incident diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy using ICD-9 codes and required no previous neuropathy diagnosis during the preceding 30 months. Focusing on 15 relevant tests, we examined the number and patterns of tests and specific test utilization performed 6 months before and after the incident neuropathy diagnosis. Medicare expenditures were assessed during the baseline, diagnostic, and follow-up periods.
Results
Of the 12,673 patients, 1,031(8.1%) received a new ICD-9 diagnosis of neuropathy and met our inclusion criteria. Of the 15 tests considered, a median of 4 (inter-quartile range (IQR)=2–5) tests were performed with over 400 patterns of testing. An MRI of the brain and/or spine was ordered in 23.2%, whereas a glucose tolerance test was rarely obtained (1%). Medicare expenditures were significantly higher in the diagnostic period compared to the baseline period (mean $14,363 versus $8,067, p<0.0001).
Conclusions
Patients diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy typically undergo many tests but testing patterns are highly variable. Almost one-quarter of patients receiving neuropathy diagnoses undergo high-cost, low-yield MRIs while very few receive low-cost, high-yield glucose tolerance tests. Expenditures increase substantially in the diagnostic period. More research is needed to define effective and efficient strategies for the diagnostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathy.