1992
DOI: 10.1080/13854049208404115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice effects in repeated neuropsychological assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33,34 At least several of the tests used in our battery (i.e., Trail's test, Finger Tapping test, Digit Span forward, Reaction time) have been reported to lack significant practice effects. 35 To minimize potential practice effects in the current study, tests with alternate forms were selected whenever possible (e.g., 4 forms of the Selective reminding test) and the tests were administered in a predetermined order. 36 The testing was also spaced as far apart in time as possible (e.g., every 6 months), yet still allowing us to study the effects of a 48-week course of antiviral therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33,34 At least several of the tests used in our battery (i.e., Trail's test, Finger Tapping test, Digit Span forward, Reaction time) have been reported to lack significant practice effects. 35 To minimize potential practice effects in the current study, tests with alternate forms were selected whenever possible (e.g., 4 forms of the Selective reminding test) and the tests were administered in a predetermined order. 36 The testing was also spaced as far apart in time as possible (e.g., every 6 months), yet still allowing us to study the effects of a 48-week course of antiviral therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testretest reproducibility varied from 0.62 for simple reaction time to 0.78 and 0.85 for digits forward and backward, respectively, and 0.80 and 0.92 for Trail's A and B, respectively. 18 The Shipley Institute of Living scale was administered at baseline and a full-scale intelligence quotient estimate from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised was calculated using population controls with a mean of 100 and SD of 15. 19 Standard scores (SSs) were calculated for each neuropsychological test using normative data.…”
Section: Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of this effect is dependent on the specific test given, time elapsed be tween testings, age and other variables. McCaffrey et al [13] and Dodrill et al [14] reported that tests that have a speeded com ponent, require an infrequently practiced re sponse, or that have a single easily conceptual ized solution are likely to result in significant practice effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice effect is a well-established bias in repeated neuropsychological tests [13][14][15][16]. The magnitude of this effect is dependent on the specific test given, time elapsed be tween testings, age and other variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such repeated assessment assumes that these tests have sufficiently high test-retest reliability (Lowe & Rabbitt, 1998), but many tests of cognitive function suffer from significant practice effects, where performance improves with repeated testing (Benedict & Zgaljiardic, 1998;Collie, Maruff, Darby, & McStephen, 2003;McCaffrey, Ortega, Orsillo, Nelles, & Haase, 1992;McCaffrey & Westervelt, 1995;Rapport, Brooke-Brines, Axelrod, & Theisen, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%