Practice Effects Associated with the Repeated Assessment of Cognitive Function Using the CogState Battery at 10-minute, One Week and One Month Test-retest Intervals

Abstract

There are many situations in which cognitive tests need to be administered on more than two occasions and at very brief test-retest intervals to detect change in group performance. However, previous literature has not specifically addressed these important issues. The main aim of the current study was to examine these two factors by using a computerized cognitive battery designed specifically for the repeated assessment of cognition (i.e., CogState) in healthy young adult individuals. A further aim of the study was to examine how many times the battery needed to be completed before performance, as measured by the battery, stabilized. Forty-five adults (age range: 18-40 years) completed the battery four times at 10-minute test-retest intervals, and a fifth time at an interval of one week. The results illustrated that when brief test-retest intervals were used (i.e., 10 minutes), performance stabilized after the second assessment, as significant practice effects were generally observed between the first and the second assessments. Practice effects were also observed on some of the tasks at a one-week test-retest interval. Due to these findings, 55 adults (age range: 18-40 years) completed the battery twice at 10-minute test-retest intervals (i.e., to eliminate the initial practice effect), and a third time at an interval of one month. No practice effects were observed. The implications of the results are discussed in terms of methods that can be adopted in order to minimize practice effects when this particular cognitive battery is used.

A randomized controlled trial of light versus deep propofol sedation for elective outpatient colonoscopy: recall, procedural conditions, and recovery

“…Negative effect size indicates poorer performance in post-procedure than in pre-procedure testing At hospital discharge, patients in this study were cognitively impaired with reduced speed of response and task accuracy, as measured by the Cogstate brief test battery, which is similar to previous studies. [10][11][12][13][14] These results did not differ between patients with light vs deep sedation; consequently, while light sedation might confer logistic advantages, they cannot be extended to cognitive improvement at hospital discharge. Patients were not retested; thus, no conclusions can be made between the light and deep sedation groups regarding the speed or completeness of recovery to baseline cognition.…”

Infant motor development and cognitive performance in early old age: the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study

“…CogState cognitive test battery has been validated (Maruff et al 2009) and designed to be efficient and sensitive in identifying major cognitive domains such as psychomotor speed, visual attention, working memory, divided attention, and associated learning (Darby et al 2002). CogState test battery has shown good reliability with minimal practice effects (Falleti et al 2006). Each of the five tasks of the test battery consists of 30 to 50 repeated stimuli, and it takes approximately 15 min to complete the whole test battery.…”

Measuring the mind: assessing cognitive change in clinical drug trials

“…This is regrettable in that the most acute effects on test experience and familiarity are a feature of the data collected at baseline. Our experience suggests that a significant proportion of individuals show marked learning effects as a result of a single exposure to cognitive tests but, thereafter, the effects of familiarity are markedly reduced and, in some cases, entirely expunged [2]. A major virtue of training is that it helps to reduce improvements owing to the study participant's familiarity with the experience of being tested, so-called 'method' variance.…”