2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00373.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice challenges at the intersection of child protection and mental health

Abstract: This paper examines the complexity of collaboration between child protection and mental health services, where a parent has a mental illness and there are protection concerns for children. The paper reports on data from focused in‐depth interviews with 36 child protection workers, adult mental health workers and child and youth mental health workers. Data were analysed thematically, using NVivo to facilitate data management and analysis. Two dimensions were identified. The first, the process of collaboration, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The interviews with professionals focused on detailed exploration of one case involving both mental health and child protection issues (see Darlington et al, 2005b). The 4 parent interviews were with the parent whose case had been discussed in the interview with one of their workers and focused on the parent's experiences of service provision from both mental health and child protection services.…”
Section: The Interagency Collaboration In Child Protection and Mentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interviews with professionals focused on detailed exploration of one case involving both mental health and child protection issues (see Darlington et al, 2005b). The 4 parent interviews were with the parent whose case had been discussed in the interview with one of their workers and focused on the parent's experiences of service provision from both mental health and child protection services.…”
Section: The Interagency Collaboration In Child Protection and Mentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Interagency Collaboration in Child Protection and Mental Health Project was a mixed-method study of collaboration between child protection and mental health workers in cases where a parent had a mental illness and there were protection concerns for a child in the family (see Darlington et al, 2004Darlington et al, , 2005aDarlington et al, , 2005b. The project was conducted in Queensland, Australia, where child protection and adult mental health are the responsibility of separate state government departments.…”
Section: The Interagency Collaboration In Child Protection and Mentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that good communication and a clear understanding of professional roles and responsibilities are important prerequisites, as well as mutual trust and an understanding of each other's duties and responsibilities (Darlington et al 2004). Formal agreements regulating collaboration are also important, in addition to having enough resources in terms of time and financing to be able to collaborate successfully (Darlington et al 2005;Katz and Hetherington 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting professional aims and mandates cause tensions and challenges (Darlington et al 2005). In the Barnahus context, it is especially the tension between the criminal case and a need to ensure the child's well-being and psychological treatment that represents a challenge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature indicates that inter-agency practice is inherently fraught with challenges, as it requires trust (Darlington & Feeney, 2008;Horwath & T.Morrison, 2007;Jones, Crook, Reid, & Webb, 2008); effective communication (Darlington, Feeney & Rixon, 2005; B. Head, 2008;Spath, Werrbach, & Pine, 2008); the development of shared understandings and goals (Horwath & T.Morrison, 2007); strong and competent leadership (Jones et al, 2008); and adequate resource allocation (Metcalfe, Riedlinger, McKenzie, & Cook, 2007).…”
Section: Benefits and Challenges Of Collaborative Practicementioning
confidence: 99%