2018
DOI: 10.14349/sumapsi.2018.v25.n1.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prácticas culturales de sedentarismo y actividad física de estudiantes de Psicología

Abstract: Resumen El presente estudio tuvo como propósito analizar funcionalmente las prácticas de sedentarismo y actividad física en una institución universitaria, siguiendo los presupuestos de la ciencia de las prácticas culturales, a través de un diseño mixto de investigación. Inicialmente se estableció el promedio de pasos diario y la actividad física moderada vigorosa en el tiempo libre, utilizando podómetros y el Cuestionario Internacional de Actividad Física; posteriormente, se realizaron 20 entrevistas y una obs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors such as Hein, Blanco and Mertz (2004); Sanabria and Uribe (2010); Ballesteros and Cortés (2001), coincide with some of those described by pastoral agents, classify social risks in 6 areas covering the individual and sociocultural, including factors such as individual factors related to the ability to solve problems, IQ, family factors such as family cohesion, mental illness and parenting styles; factors linked to the peer group, highlighting belonging and identification with peers who engage in illicit and risky activities including PAS consumption; school factors related to the lack of support from the teacher, alienation and school violence as risks, and finally social and socioeconomic factors linked to the lack of community commitment to the protection of adolescents, exclusion and stigmatization of adolescents, a discourse that converges with that mentioned by the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors such as Hein, Blanco and Mertz (2004); Sanabria and Uribe (2010); Ballesteros and Cortés (2001), coincide with some of those described by pastoral agents, classify social risks in 6 areas covering the individual and sociocultural, including factors such as individual factors related to the ability to solve problems, IQ, family factors such as family cohesion, mental illness and parenting styles; factors linked to the peer group, highlighting belonging and identification with peers who engage in illicit and risky activities including PAS consumption; school factors related to the lack of support from the teacher, alienation and school violence as risks, and finally social and socioeconomic factors linked to the lack of community commitment to the protection of adolescents, exclusion and stigmatization of adolescents, a discourse that converges with that mentioned by the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%