“…Despite the ease with which the ground‐force estimate can be recorded, the convention for Vibroseis data is still to correlate the data with the synthetic pilot. Although improvements in the accuracy of the ground‐force measurement have been claimed through the use of stiffer baseplates and more careful accelerometer placement (Wei ; Tellier, Caradec and Ollivrin ) measurements with thin‐film pressure pads suggest that the transmitted signal is too complex for a single accelerometer to measure (Dean et al . ).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the ease with which the ground-force estimate can be recorded, the convention for Vibroseis data is still to correlate the data with the synthetic pilot. Although improvements in the accuracy of the ground-force measurement have been claimed through the use of stiffer baseplates and more careful accelerometer placement (Wei 2009;Tellier, Caradec and Ollivrin 2015) measurements with thinfilm pressure pads suggest that the transmitted signal is too complex for a single accelerometer to measure (Dean et al 2015). In particular, the ground-force signal tends to have a much higher harmonic noise content than the geophone measurements (Saragiotis, Scholtz and Bagaini 2010) resulting in the harmonic noise level of the data being over-estimated resulting in additional noise contamination.…”
Since its introduction in the late 1950s, hydraulic vibrators have become the dominant source for land seismic surveys. The hydraulic vibrators typically used for commercial land seismic acquisition, however, are large, costly to operate and expensive to purchase. This inhibits their use for small‐scale and short‐duration surveys as well as Vibroseis research. In this paper we describe, in detail, the construction of a portable vibrator from commercially available components for a cost of less than $US2,000. Data shows that the vibrator is able to successfully transmit sweeps from 15 to 180 Hz with different spectral contents. The vibrator produces a stronger signal than a sledgehammer and we estimate its output to be around 1 kN. The frequency content of the data was concentrated at lower frequencies (<100 Hz) and the ground‐roll was far more energetic than that produced using a sledgehammer.
“…Despite the ease with which the ground‐force estimate can be recorded, the convention for Vibroseis data is still to correlate the data with the synthetic pilot. Although improvements in the accuracy of the ground‐force measurement have been claimed through the use of stiffer baseplates and more careful accelerometer placement (Wei ; Tellier, Caradec and Ollivrin ) measurements with thin‐film pressure pads suggest that the transmitted signal is too complex for a single accelerometer to measure (Dean et al . ).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the ease with which the ground-force estimate can be recorded, the convention for Vibroseis data is still to correlate the data with the synthetic pilot. Although improvements in the accuracy of the ground-force measurement have been claimed through the use of stiffer baseplates and more careful accelerometer placement (Wei 2009;Tellier, Caradec and Ollivrin 2015) measurements with thinfilm pressure pads suggest that the transmitted signal is too complex for a single accelerometer to measure (Dean et al 2015). In particular, the ground-force signal tends to have a much higher harmonic noise content than the geophone measurements (Saragiotis, Scholtz and Bagaini 2010) resulting in the harmonic noise level of the data being over-estimated resulting in additional noise contamination.…”
Since its introduction in the late 1950s, hydraulic vibrators have become the dominant source for land seismic surveys. The hydraulic vibrators typically used for commercial land seismic acquisition, however, are large, costly to operate and expensive to purchase. This inhibits their use for small‐scale and short‐duration surveys as well as Vibroseis research. In this paper we describe, in detail, the construction of a portable vibrator from commercially available components for a cost of less than $US2,000. Data shows that the vibrator is able to successfully transmit sweeps from 15 to 180 Hz with different spectral contents. The vibrator produces a stronger signal than a sledgehammer and we estimate its output to be around 1 kN. The frequency content of the data was concentrated at lower frequencies (<100 Hz) and the ground‐roll was far more energetic than that produced using a sledgehammer.
“…At the high end of the spectrum (from about 80 up to 250 Hz), vibrators still face mechanical and hydraulic problems related to the rigidity of their baseplate, the ground behaviour, and the response of the valves at high frequency (Wei and Phillips ). These limitations may be mitigated using properly designed vibrators with stable hydraulic pressure and more rigid baseplate (Tellier, Caradec and Ollivrin ). However, above ∼80 Hz (depending on ground conditions), there is a phase shift, increasing with frequency, between the reaction mass and the baseplate.…”
Section: Land Equipment For Broadband Seismic: the Source Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…properly designed vibrators with stable hydraulic pressure and more rigid baseplate (Tellier, Caradec and Ollivrin 2015a). However, above ß80 Hz (depending on ground conditions), there is a phase shift, increasing with frequency, between the reaction mass and the baseplate.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More often than not, this is not enough to record high-frequency reflections due to their strong absorption during propagation. Such attenuation may be compensated using high-dwell sweeps (or logarithmic sweeps) where the time spent increases with frequency (Tellier et al 2015a). However, field tests showed that, except for sensors in a borehole, it is still difficult to recover high frequencies above 80 or 120 Hz depending on ground conditions (Mougenot and Meunier 2002).…”
The broadband capabilities of marine, seabed, and land seismic equipment are reviewed with respect to both the source and the receiver sides. In marine acquisition, the main issue at both ends of the spectrum relates to ghosts occurring at the sea surface. Broadband deghosting requires towing at variable depth to introduce notch diversity or using new equipment like multi‐component and/or low‐noise streamers. As a result, a doubling of the bandwidth from about three to six octaves (2.5–200 Hz) has been achieved. Such improvement is not yet observed for seabed surveys in spite of deghosting being a standard process on the receiver side. One issue may be related to the coupling of the particle motion sensor, particularly at high frequencies.
For land acquisition, progress came from the vibrators. New shakers and control electronics using broadband sweeps made it possible to add two more octaves to the low‐frequency signal (from 8 to 2 Hz). Whereas conventional 10 Hz geophones are still able to record such low frequencies, 5 Hz high gain geophones or digital accelerometers enhance them to keep the signal above the noise floor. On the high end of the bandwidth, progress is not limited by equipment specifications. Here, the issue is related to a low signal‐to‐noise ratio due to the strong absorption that occurs during signal propagation. To succeed in enlarging the bandwidth, these improved equipment and sweeps must be complemented by a denser spatial sampling of the wavefield by point–source and point–receiver acquisition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.