2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01793-3_119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical On-Line Signature Verification

Abstract: A new DTW-based on-line signature verification system is presented and evaluated. The system is specially designed to operate under realistic conditions, it needs only a small number of genuine signatures to operate and it can be deployed in almost any signature capable capture device. Optimal features sets have been obtained experimentally, in order to adapt the system to environments with different levels of security. The system has been evaluated using four on-line signature databases (MCYT, SVC2004, BIOMET… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, LNPS may be applied to online character recognition or text recognition. Second, we Method EER (%) Model Yeung et al [22] 5.50 DTW Pascual-Gaspar et al [26] 3.38 DTW Fierrez el at. [6] 6.90 HMM Van et al [7] 4.83 HMM Sharma et al [4] 2.73 DTW Our method 2.37 RNN+LNPS propose a novel RNN system for online signature verification that employs metric learning techniques and a joint training scheme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, LNPS may be applied to online character recognition or text recognition. Second, we Method EER (%) Model Yeung et al [22] 5.50 DTW Pascual-Gaspar et al [26] 3.38 DTW Fierrez el at. [6] 6.90 HMM Van et al [7] 4.83 HMM Sharma et al [4] 2.73 DTW Our method 2.37 RNN+LNPS propose a novel RNN system for online signature verification that employs metric learning techniques and a joint training scheme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme can be applied to more sophisticated online signature verification algorithms such as [25], [26]. Thus, our future projects will include evaluation of the scheme in such algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm error rates in previous experiments with portable devices were EER = 1.8% for random forgeries and EER = 7.6% for skilled forgeries. As the algorithm performance is out of the topic of this research, a detailed description and the previous results obtained are not included, though can be accessed via the referenced paper [9]. The biometric system performance results will be given through the EER, which even not offering the complete information about the results, offers a good trade-off between the FAR and FRR, measure enough for comparing the accuracy between the experiments.…”
Section: Algorithm Detailsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The system analyzed uses a DTW-based handwritten signature recognition algorithm [9] in mobile scenarios. The experiment was made under a scenario evaluation and the users were invited to sign in four different devices, in five different positions and in three sessions separated one week each.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%