Practical nonlinear design optimization tool for power converter components

Ridley, R.B.; Lee, F. C.

doi:10.1109/pesc.1987.7077198

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The approach offers the opportunity to get a first solution rapidly. Moreover, the solutions may be performed on some local aspects ± few parameters ± by an optimisation process on simulation (Ridley and Lee, 1987;Kragh et al, 1998).…”

Section: Remarks On the Constraintsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An analytical process to size a flyback converter

Schutz¹,

Gerbaud²,

Roudet³

et al. 2001

COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper deals with the sizing of a flyback converter. The approach proposes to use symbolic calculation to perform sizing times, the accuracy and the number of parameters to size. So, it presents a symbolic model to size a flyback converter using optimisation techniques. Such an approach is preferred to a simulation approach thanks to the flexibility of symbolic models and their possibility to treat a great set of criteria in few seconds or minutes. The expressions of a great part of the criteria are made by an automatic symbolic process ± model builders ± and the others are carried out by the designer. Such a model is used in a gradient optimisation process well known for its convergence properties. From this model, a builder carries out automatically the building of a dedicated sizing tool, by automatically transforming it into an optimisation problem and by automatically giving the corresponding sizing tool with its GUI.

show abstract

Section: Remarks On the Constraintsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An analytical process to size a flyback converter

Schutz¹,

Gerbaud²,

Roudet³

et al. 2001

COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the other cases, numerical simulation is absolutely necessary. It appears to be a good alternative but it requires more computer treatments (Ridley andLee 1987, Viarouge et al, 1993). This concerns applications with big or complex state equations (with possibly non linearities) and/or with control aspects that are difficult, indeed impossible to express without great simplifications of the application ± evolving according to time, closed loop regulation, etc.…”

Section: Application Domainmentioning

confidence: 99%

An optimisation process of power electronics applications

Gerbaud¹,

Atienza²,

Bolopion³

et al. 2001

COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper deals with the sizing of controlled converter applications, with possibly, closed control loops, by combining several tools. The approach proposes to use symbolic calculation to perform sizing times, but also numerical calculation when symbolic expressions do not exist. The sizing model is deduced from criteria on the components (control values, average values, losses, rms values, maximum values, durations, etc.). The approach is based on two development environments: Gentiane for the modelling and simulation and Eden for the optimisation.

show abstract

Transformer Design

Erickson¹,

Maksimović²

2020

Fundamentals of Power Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Practical nonlinear design optimization tool for power converter components

Cited by 10 publications

References 3 publications

An analytical process to size a flyback converter

An analytical process to size a flyback converter

An optimisation process of power electronics applications

Transformer Design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About