2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1454263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical limits on positron accumulation and the creation of electron-positron plasmas

Abstract: Abstract. The tasks of accumulating large numbers of positrons, creating high-density positron plastnas, and confining electron-positron plasmas present a number of technical challenges. Some practical considerations and limitations of common confinement schemes are discussed. A novel design for a multi-ccll Penning-Malmberg trap is proposed for the accumulation of large numbers of positrons (e.g., > 1012 and T -05 cV). A method is dcscribed to create a Ilow-density, electronpositron plasma (e.g., it "-107 cmt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particles would be cooled by inelastic vibrational collisions with a molecule such as CO 2 . Details of the cooling process are discussed by Greaves and Surko (2002b), and additional considerations, including heating due to lepton-neutral collisions, are discussed in Surko et al (2014). A limitation of the Penning-Paul approach is that practical rf field amplitudes restrict the confining potential to ≤ 10 V, which restricts studies to relatively cool, low-density plasmas.…”
Section: Classical Electron-positron (Pair) Plasmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The particles would be cooled by inelastic vibrational collisions with a molecule such as CO 2 . Details of the cooling process are discussed by Greaves and Surko (2002b), and additional considerations, including heating due to lepton-neutral collisions, are discussed in Surko et al (2014). A limitation of the Penning-Paul approach is that practical rf field amplitudes restrict the confining potential to ≤ 10 V, which restricts studies to relatively cool, low-density plasmas.…”
Section: Classical Electron-positron (Pair) Plasmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in Fig. 47, a cylindrical PM trap was proposed, but with rf on the confining end electrodes (as opposed to potentials) to provide the repulsive potential to confine particles with both sign of charge (Greaves and Surko, 2002b). Positive dc potentials could also be applied to the electrodes to aid in positron confinement, in this case using the electrons sacrificially.…”
Section: Classical Electron-positron (Pair) Plasmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new positron accumulator has been the workhorse for all subsequent positron experiments conducted during the grant period. [1,3,9,15,23,25] Cold beam experiments. Immediately preceding this grant, we developed a new method to create cold positron and electron beams by carefully extracting the particles from a Malmberg-Penning trap.…”
Section: Sponsoring/monitoring Agency Name(s) and Address(es)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the fast loading mode where the positrons are stored and cooled to 2 meV in a Greaves-Surko trap [16] and extracted in ∼ 10 µs. This fast extraction heats the positron beam.…”
Section: The Positronium Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Greaves-Surko traps [14,15,16] are available with a capability to hold 10 12 positrons and provided that the neutral plasma can be held during the time required to empty the trap, one could produce a density of positronium of ∼ 0.3 10 14 cm −3 . An experiment to observe the stimulated annihilation process would then become feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%