2003
DOI: 10.1364/ao.42.005284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical issues in wave-front sensing by use of phase diversity

Abstract: We present the results of the phase-diversity algorithm applied to simulated and laboratory data. We show that the exact amount of defocus distance does not need to be known exactly for the phase-diversity algorithm on extended scene imaging. We determine, through computer simulation, the optimum diversity distance for various scene types. Using laboratory data, we compare the aberrations recovered with the phase-diversity algorithm and those measured with a Fizeau interferometer that uses a He-Ne laser. The t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the diversity magnitude, a few studies can be found in the literature dealing with, for instance, an optimal defocus distance in the conventional PD [27][28][29]. However, less attention has been paid on how the multi-image PD will change the requirements for optimality and robustness.…”
Section: A Optimal Diversity Magnitude and Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the diversity magnitude, a few studies can be found in the literature dealing with, for instance, an optimal defocus distance in the conventional PD [27][28][29]. However, less attention has been paid on how the multi-image PD will change the requirements for optimality and robustness.…”
Section: A Optimal Diversity Magnitude and Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a conventional approach, the only method used to generate PD is to defocus the detector. In this case, the accuracy of the wavefront parameter is affected by the defocus distance 7,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a conventional approach, the only method to generate PDs is to defocus the detector; divide incoming light using a beam splitter, then guide one half of the beam to an in-focus image and the other to a defocused image. The accuracy of the wavefront parameter is affected by the defocus distance 7,8) . Because of the beam splitter, the light energy available for the focused image is lower, which decreases the signal-to-noise ratio of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%