2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical informativeness of short tandem repeat loci for chimerism analysis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not detect any donor carrying a clonal hematopoiesis-related mutation [20]. The number of informative SNPs was variable (median 25.5, range 9-41) and higher than that of STR (median 10.5, range [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Donor chimerism from NGS analysis highly correlated with results from STR analysis, with r 2 = 0.994 (p < 0.0001) by least-squares analysis (Figure 2a), and all data points were within 3 SDs of the mean % difference on Blant-Altman plot (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of Ngs Donor Chimerismmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not detect any donor carrying a clonal hematopoiesis-related mutation [20]. The number of informative SNPs was variable (median 25.5, range 9-41) and higher than that of STR (median 10.5, range [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Donor chimerism from NGS analysis highly correlated with results from STR analysis, with r 2 = 0.994 (p < 0.0001) by least-squares analysis (Figure 2a), and all data points were within 3 SDs of the mean % difference on Blant-Altman plot (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of Ngs Donor Chimerismmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…STR analysis was performed using AmpFlSTR Identifier PCR Amplification (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) as previously reported [11]. Briefly, 16 STR markers were amplified; D8S1179 at chromosome 8, D21S11 at 21q11.2-q21, D7S820 at 7q11.2-22, CSF1PO at 5q33.3-34, D3S1358 at 3p, TH01 at 11p15.5, D13S317 at 13q22-31, D16S539 at 16q24-qter, D2S1338 at 2q35-37.1, D19S433 at 19q12-13.1, vWA at 12p12-pter, TPOX at 2p23-2per, D18S51 at 18q21.3, D5S818 at 5q21-31, and FGA at 4q28, the amelogenin locus at X (p22.1-22.3) and Y (p11.2) chromosomes.…”
Section: Str Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some authors have suggested that undertaking a careful process of STR-marker selection is crucial in all the cases of chimerism monitoring in order to guarantee an accurate and reliable result. This selection should be performed to choose the most suitable STR for the chimerism monitoring considering all the variables (both instrumental and biological) that can affect the analysis [ 18 , 35 , 52 ]. For instance, many scholars agree that STR markers should be excluded from the chimerism calculation when the recipient’s stutter peak coincides with one of the donor’s peaks or vice versa in order to avoid interference in chimerism quantification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, many scholars agree that STR markers should be excluded from the chimerism calculation when the recipient’s stutter peak coincides with one of the donor’s peaks or vice versa in order to avoid interference in chimerism quantification. This is also true for markers which are shared between the donor and the recipient, given the impossibility of identifying the origin of the STR alleles [ 18 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 41 ]. As claimed by Kristt et al [ 28 ] and Navarro-Bailón et al [ 34 ], this latter circumstance is more common in the case of transplantation occurring between related donor–recipient pairs than in the case of transplantation between unrelated pairs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation