2023
DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20220302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Implications of the Update to the 2015 Japan Standard Population: Mortality Archive From 1950 to 2020 in Japan

Abstract: This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direct standardized method was used on the basis of the 2015 Japan Standard Population. 23 Mortality estimates calculated by weighted unique-key sample population were compared with complete mortality registry, to assess generalization of mortality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct standardized method was used on the basis of the 2015 Japan Standard Population. 23 Mortality estimates calculated by weighted unique-key sample population were compared with complete mortality registry, to assess generalization of mortality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated age-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs) for all causes of death combined and cause-specific deaths for major causes from 1995 to 2021 to assess trends in mortality rates. ASMRs were calculated using the 2015 Japan Standard Population 5. We further calculated the annual percent changes in ASMRs before and during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020 and 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 ) The estimated age-adjusted nationwide incidence and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated based on the 2015 Japan Standard Population. 6 , 7 ) Explanatory variables for multivariable logistic regression models were restricted to ≈10% of patients in the less frequent category. 8 ) Variables were chosen a priori based on clinical relevance among factors with p values of <0.10 in the univariate analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%