2016
DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical implications of integrated glioma classification according to the World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system 2016

Abstract: We summarize the relevant changes in the revised WHO classification of gliomas, outline the integrated approach, and discuss its practical implications and potential challenges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malzkorn and Reifenberger15 put forth the practical implications concerning increased costs, quality control of newer techniques and increased turnaround time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malzkorn and Reifenberger15 put forth the practical implications concerning increased costs, quality control of newer techniques and increased turnaround time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDH1 or IDH2 mutations are found in both astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors since they act as a starting point for gliomagenesis. Therefore, the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification guidelines combined astrocytic tumors and oligodendroglial tumors into one category [7-10]. Furthermore, each tumor has a typical genetic signature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not known yet whether and how heterozygosity or homozygosity for IDH mutations influences biological behavior. The vast majority of diffuse gliomas presenting as glioblastoma at first diagnosis are IDH wild type (‘primary glioblastomas’) [90, 91, 93, 105]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%