1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00053519
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical implementation of the double linear damage rule and damage curve approach for treating cumulative fatigue damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
252
0
6

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 438 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
252
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Fatigue lifetime prediction models have been based on inelastic strain, total strain, stress and other approaches. Common empirical correlations to predict fatigue lifetime include the Basquin Law, [35] the Coffin-Manson relation, [36] the Coffin-Halford formula, [37] and Neuber's rule. [35] In this work, the inelastic strain is much higher than the elastic strain, so a simplified Coffin-Manson approach, [36,38] appears most appropriate:…”
Section: E Fatigue Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue lifetime prediction models have been based on inelastic strain, total strain, stress and other approaches. Common empirical correlations to predict fatigue lifetime include the Basquin Law, [35] the Coffin-Manson relation, [36] the Coffin-Halford formula, [37] and Neuber's rule. [35] In this work, the inelastic strain is much higher than the elastic strain, so a simplified Coffin-Manson approach, [36,38] appears most appropriate:…”
Section: E Fatigue Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manson and Halford (1981) proposed the d<;>uble linear rule primarily based on the damage curve approach for treating cumulative fatigue damage. In their paper, an effort was made to mathematically represent the damage curve and approximate it by two piecewise line segments.…”
Section: Results Of Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the damage curve approach described above, the 'Y-parameter is usually assumed to be dependent solely on the stress amplitude level [Manson and Halford (1981) The 'Y-parameter was found to have the following form: ' Y = (2I3)Np·4, where Nf is the number of cycles to failure under a constant load amplitude. For example, if Nf is assumed to be 10 5 cycles, the 'Y-parameter is then equal to 66.7 which appears to be extremely high especially for damage computation when D«1.…”
Section: Results Of Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grover (1960) divided the damage growth into two such phases, and then proposed post facto (after examining multi-level load data) damage formulae. The idea of two such phases was adopted and adapted by Manson et al (1967) and Manson & Halford (1981, 1986 into the well-known double linear damage rule (DLDR). The DLDR has been viewed as a credible alternative to Miner's rule.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%