2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Guidelines for the Comprehensive Analysis of ChIP-seq Data

Abstract: Mapping the chromosomal locations of transcription factors, nucleosomes, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling enzymes, chaperones, and polymerases is one of the key tasks of modern biology, as evidenced by the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Project. To this end, chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) is the standard methodology. Mapping such protein-DNA interactions in vivo using ChIP-seq presents multiple challenges not only in sample preparation and sequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
218
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all ChIPseq data, PCR duplicates were removed, meaning that all identical reads were collapsed to one single read. This is a common and established processing step for ChIP-seq data (52)(53)(54). BAM data were converted to BED format using the BEDtools bamToBed option (55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all ChIPseq data, PCR duplicates were removed, meaning that all identical reads were collapsed to one single read. This is a common and established processing step for ChIP-seq data (52)(53)(54). BAM data were converted to BED format using the BEDtools bamToBed option (55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall we obtained between 2 and 10 million reads per sample, and 70-80% of these reads uniquely aligned to the genome. This number of reads is adequate to draw meaningful conclusions in C. albicans, as it is estimated that high quality gene expression profiling can be achieved with 2 million reads per sample for yeast (Bailey et al 2013). Reads aligned primarily to exonic regions ( Figure S2A).…”
Section: Quality Control For Rna-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We filtered duplicated reads using the "auto" mode of the keep-dup function. We followed the guidelines of the ENCODE project in order to identify confident peak calls (Landt et al, 2012;Bailey et al, 2013) (Supplemental Figure 11). First, we ran MACS2 on every individual sample and subjected the peak calls of the two biological replicates of each treatment to an IDR (irreproducibility discovery rate) analysis .…”
Section: Chip-seq and Peak Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%