2020
DOI: 10.1116/6.0000377
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical guide for curve fitting in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Abstract: The use of peak fitting to extract information from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data is of growing use and importance. Due to increased instrument accessibility and reliability, the use of XPS instrumentation has significantly increased around the world. However, the increased use has not been matched by the expertise of the new users, and the erroneous application of curve fitting has contributed to ambiguity and confusion in parts of the literature. This guide discusses the physics and chemistry i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
184
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
184
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The doublet splitting between the Al 2 p 3/2 and Al 2 p 5/2 spectra is assigned to be 0.44 eV. [ 10 ] The BE is seen changed 0.62±0.05 eV for Al 2 p 5/2 peaks (Al 2 O 3 component) of Sample A before and after the TaN film deposition. This shift of +0.67 eV is also seen in the O 1 s (O‐Al bond) core‐level peaks (Figure S3, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doublet splitting between the Al 2 p 3/2 and Al 2 p 5/2 spectra is assigned to be 0.44 eV. [ 10 ] The BE is seen changed 0.62±0.05 eV for Al 2 p 5/2 peaks (Al 2 O 3 component) of Sample A before and after the TaN film deposition. This shift of +0.67 eV is also seen in the O 1 s (O‐Al bond) core‐level peaks (Figure S3, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 a,b, respectively. The experimental data obtained from XPS were deconvoluted using Gaussian profile by employing an XPS-specific deconvolution procedure to estimate the atomic interactions 27 , 28 . In C-1s spectra, the peaks at the binding energies ~ 283.2 eV, ~ 283.3–283.9 eV, ~ 284.6 eV, ~ 285.7 eV, ~ 286.6 eV, and ~ 290 eV correspond to Mg-C 18 , B-C 29 , 30 , C–C sp 2 , C–OH, C–O–C 31 33 and C-2p π → π* transition 9 , 34 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is believed that the COOH and C=O groups are absent in erGO. The XPS-specific deconvolution method 28 resulted in acceptable FWHMs for both Mg-C and B-C peaks. For B-C peaks these FWHMs are 0.91, 1.00 and 0.70 eV for B/C ≈ 0.09, 0.36 and 0.90, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14] Indeed, XPS is the most widely used and important method for chemically analyzing surfaces. XPS data is typically acquired as either wide (survey) [15] or narrow (detail) [16] scans, where the former often provide important information about the elements in a sample (the general elemental composition) and the latter are peak fit to identify and quantify the chemical/oxidation states of the elements present. As a general rule, second row elements (Li -Ne) yield more symmetric peaks on flatter backgrounds than the transition metals, actinides, and lanthanides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%