2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67428-5_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Evaluation of Lempel-Ziv-78 and Lempel-Ziv-Welch Tries

Abstract: We present the first thorough practical study of the Lempel-Ziv-78 and the Lempel-Ziv-Welch computation based on trie data structures. With a careful selection of trie representations we can beat well-tuned popular trie data structures like Judy, m-Bonsai or Cedar.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that HAT is a good data structure taking aspects like working space and time performance into account. 21 However, as demonstrated in our experiments, our DynPDT dictionaries can maintain the URI datasets in space up to 74% smaller than HAT, while keeping competitive insertion times.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Data Structuresmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They concluded that HAT is a good data structure taking aspects like working space and time performance into account. 21 However, as demonstrated in our experiments, our DynPDT dictionaries can maintain the URI datasets in space up to 74% smaller than HAT, while keeping competitive insertion times.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Data Structuresmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It takes O(t log σ) bits of space, while supporting update and some traversal operations in O(1) expected time. Fischer and Köppl [21] presented and evaluated a number of dynamic tries for LZ78 [62] and LZW [57] factorization. They also proposed an efficient hash-based trie representation in a similar way to m-Bonsai, which is referred to as FK-hash.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The source code of our implementations is freely available at https://github.com/tudocomp 18. Unfortunately, the cedar trie[71] evaluated by Fischer and Köppl[29] fails to handle our datasets, which are many times larger than the 200 MiB datasets studied there. ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, Vol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%