2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical estimation of erosion damage caused by solid particle impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
118
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 590 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (c) show that the outlet temperature changes greatly, in the process of production of gas well, the gas solid two phase fluid change pressure by the nozzle and ensure the stable pressure of natural gas production, temperature reduction is inevitable during pressure drop, because the fluid in the pipe are natural gas, the temperature of natural gas should be higher than 21 degrees to ensure the normal production. Considering solid particle impact [6][7][8][9] , Fig. 3(d) shows maximum erosion rate occurs in position where the fluid change direction in the nozzle and maximum reaches 0.0214kg.m -2 .s -1…”
Section: Calculation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 (c) show that the outlet temperature changes greatly, in the process of production of gas well, the gas solid two phase fluid change pressure by the nozzle and ensure the stable pressure of natural gas production, temperature reduction is inevitable during pressure drop, because the fluid in the pipe are natural gas, the temperature of natural gas should be higher than 21 degrees to ensure the normal production. Considering solid particle impact [6][7][8][9] , Fig. 3(d) shows maximum erosion rate occurs in position where the fluid change direction in the nozzle and maximum reaches 0.0214kg.m -2 .s -1…”
Section: Calculation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of major factors such as temperature gradient, temperature fluctuation, and molten ash amount on the corrosion rates was examined quantitatively by the laboratory temperature gradient tests [33]. Coatings 2016, 6, 34 18 of 23 Figure 20. Breakdown of the protective oxide layer and penetration of corrosive species in alloy 625 superheater tube influenced by soot blowing in WTE boiler [22].…”
Section: Formation and Break-down Of Protective Oxides Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid particle erosion damage E(α) in many materials depends on the impact angle α of particles [34], and such a damage rate with arbitrary angle shown in Figure 23 can be expressed by functions of cutting action (sinα) n1 and repeated plastic deformation (1 + HV (1 − sinα)) n2 related to the erosion damage at normal angle E90 and hardness HV of target materials. Solid particle erosion damage E(α) in many materials depends on the impact angle α of particles [34], and such a damage rate with arbitrary angle shown in Figure 23 can be expressed by functions of cutting action (sinα) n1 and repeated plastic deformation (1 + H V (1´sinα)) n2 related to the erosion damage at normal angle E 90 and hardness H V of target materials.…”
Section: Erosion and Erosion/corrosion Resistant Materials And Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vehicle parts are usually exposed to erosion. Loss of original material from a solid surface with mechanical interaction between the surface and solid or liquid particle containing uid is called erosion [2]. Researchers always try to nd a way to reduce material loss and energy consumption [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%