2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical differentially private online advertising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the accuracy and concurrency of the recommendation model, passengers' ticket purchase data over the last five years were randomly extracted for experimentation. The precision rates, recall rates, F1 scores, and NDCG of corresponding testing results were averaged and compared with recommendation results and concurrencies obtained by classic algorithms, such as FM [25], FFM [26], Wide&Deep [27], DeepFM [28], and the DCN. This study employed the traditional recommendation algorithm FM and the deep learning-based recommendation algorithm Wide&Deep as baselines for testing and evaluation [19,29].…”
Section: Experimental Process and Experimental Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the accuracy and concurrency of the recommendation model, passengers' ticket purchase data over the last five years were randomly extracted for experimentation. The precision rates, recall rates, F1 scores, and NDCG of corresponding testing results were averaged and compared with recommendation results and concurrencies obtained by classic algorithms, such as FM [25], FFM [26], Wide&Deep [27], DeepFM [28], and the DCN. This study employed the traditional recommendation algorithm FM and the deep learning-based recommendation algorithm Wide&Deep as baselines for testing and evaluation [19,29].…”
Section: Experimental Process and Experimental Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%