2016
DOI: 10.1080/21520704.2015.1123207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical considerations for self-disclosure in applied sport psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lead author moderated the forum accordance existing guidance (e.g., O'Grady et al, 2010) by initiating posts and reading and responding to posts where appropriate within 24 hours and inviting further discussion from the group. As selfdisclosure has been suggested as an effective strategy to encourage disclosure in others in sport psychology settings the lead author shared their own recent experiences of injury in the forum, drawing on the guidelines of Way and Vosloo (2016).…”
Section: Discussion Forummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lead author moderated the forum accordance existing guidance (e.g., O'Grady et al, 2010) by initiating posts and reading and responding to posts where appropriate within 24 hours and inviting further discussion from the group. As selfdisclosure has been suggested as an effective strategy to encourage disclosure in others in sport psychology settings the lead author shared their own recent experiences of injury in the forum, drawing on the guidelines of Way and Vosloo (2016).…”
Section: Discussion Forummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant sport psychology literature (see Table 1) reveals more frequent (compared with unavoidable, accidental, inappropriate, client-initiated) instances of deliberate selfdisclosures in the context of sport psychology practice. Therefore, it could be that deliberate self-disclosure is pre-dominantly used by sport psychology consultants as a means of inviting athlete self-disclosure as an entry point to the opening-up and relationship-building process (Way & Vosloo, 2016), and in creating facilitative conditions underpinning effective practice (Katz & Hemmings, 2009;Sharp, Hodge & Danish, 2015;Windsor, Barker & McCarthy, 2011). Adopting this point-of-view, however, poses some interesting paradoxes of practice.…”
Section: Insert Tablementioning
confidence: 99%