2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical assessment of nanoscale indentation techniques for the biomechanical properties of biological materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the cortical bone depend also on other factors such as the anatomical zone of the tested sample, sex, age, the hydration state of the material, the probe geometry, etc... [25,33,45,49,58]. The finite element approach has thus become essential for determining the mechanical properties of materials such as the cortical bone [8,12,22], particularly their time-dependent mechanical properties such as creep, viscoelasticity or elastoplasticity [12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the cortical bone depend also on other factors such as the anatomical zone of the tested sample, sex, age, the hydration state of the material, the probe geometry, etc... [25,33,45,49,58]. The finite element approach has thus become essential for determining the mechanical properties of materials such as the cortical bone [8,12,22], particularly their time-dependent mechanical properties such as creep, viscoelasticity or elastoplasticity [12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the capability to capture the high‐resolution image, AFM can also detect the mechanical properties of the specimen by monitoring the interaction between the probe and sample surface (Sahin & Erina, ; Dokukin & Sokolov, ; Chang et al. , ). Graham et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the capability to capture the high-resolution image, AFM can also detect the mechanical properties of the specimen by monitoring the interaction between the probe and sample surface (Sahin & Erina, 2008;Dokukin & Sokolov, 2012;Chang et al, 2016). Graham et al (2010) imaged the ultrastructure of the native biomolecules, which were different types of the collagen, among the sectioned tissue by AFM and connected the observation from different microscopes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty of the nanomechanical properties obtained in AFM-based measurement arises from the degradation of the tip geometry [32,33]. The change in the tip geometry results in the variation of tip-sample interaction characteristics, increasing challenges to determining an appropriate contact model for the determination of elastic modulus.…”
Section: Current Challenges In Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%