2015
DOI: 10.1002/fld.4035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical aspects of p‐multigrid discontinuous Galerkin solver for steady and unsteady RANS simulations

Abstract: SUMMARYEfficient and robust p-multigrid solvers are presented for solving the system arising from high-order discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of the compressible Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. Two types of multigrid methods and a multigrid preconditioned Newton-Krylov method are investigated, and both steady and unsteady algorithms are considered in this paper. For steady algorithms, a new strategy is introduced to determine the CFL number, which has been proved to be critical in achie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The factorization cost of element‐wise implicit solvers for 3‐D simulations grows rapidly with the polynomial order, proportional to false(p+1false)9$$ {\left(p+1\right)}^9 $$, as well as the memory footprint, proportional to false(p+1false)6$$ {\left(p+1\right)}^6 $$. A lot of developments have already been made in those two areas, namely, the p‐multigrid method 12‐22 and the Mach number preconditioning technique 23‐28 . However, it does not seem that an attempt has been made to combine both p‐multigrid and preconditioning techniques in an unsteady high‐order framework with an explicit iterative smoother.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factorization cost of element‐wise implicit solvers for 3‐D simulations grows rapidly with the polynomial order, proportional to false(p+1false)9$$ {\left(p+1\right)}^9 $$, as well as the memory footprint, proportional to false(p+1false)6$$ {\left(p+1\right)}^6 $$. A lot of developments have already been made in those two areas, namely, the p‐multigrid method 12‐22 and the Mach number preconditioning technique 23‐28 . However, it does not seem that an attempt has been made to combine both p‐multigrid and preconditioning techniques in an unsteady high‐order framework with an explicit iterative smoother.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%