2020 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf20) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/radarconf2043947.2020.9266646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Aspects of Cognitive Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These three factors are necessary elements for future CR models that require a hierarchy of PAC loops. This paper extends the discussion in [20], where the factors above were introduced, by providing further analysis, outlining potential hardware requirements and limitations, discussing solutions to challenges that occur when the PAC changes too fast or too slow relative to the environment, presenting a scalable model for the practical implementation of CR, and highlighting how metrics are impacted by this model. This model is intentionally generic to address several radar applications; however, our focus here is the spectrum sharing application in order to demonstrate implementation for autonomous, real-time radar (described in Section II).…”
Section: • Autonomous Regulation Of Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These three factors are necessary elements for future CR models that require a hierarchy of PAC loops. This paper extends the discussion in [20], where the factors above were introduced, by providing further analysis, outlining potential hardware requirements and limitations, discussing solutions to challenges that occur when the PAC changes too fast or too slow relative to the environment, presenting a scalable model for the practical implementation of CR, and highlighting how metrics are impacted by this model. This model is intentionally generic to address several radar applications; however, our focus here is the spectrum sharing application in order to demonstrate implementation for autonomous, real-time radar (described in Section II).…”
Section: • Autonomous Regulation Of Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…CONCLUSION A constrained online learning approach for pulse-agile cognitive radar was presented. This structure can be applied to a wide range of decision-making algorithms 3 , demonstrated by the constrained linear TS and EXP3 algorithms presented in Algorithms 1 and 2. Through simulations in dynamic radarcommunication coexistence settings, the proposed scheme was demonstrated to reduce distortion effects for favorable detection performance when a cost function based on interference avoidance is used.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The total number of unique values the interference vector can take is thus 2 S Definition 1. Define the collision bandwidth as (3) where f start and f end are the lowest and highest frequencies in the shared channel and the sum is taken with precision (f end − f start )/S. BW c thus corresponds to the fraction of the shared channel bandwidth occupied by both the radar's waveform w i and the interference vector s t .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of software defined radio (SDR) for research and development of radar applications has become attractive inasmuch as the flexibilization of the system increases by the facility in the change of (radio frequency) RF parameters such as frequency and gain [1], [2]. The integration of these two technologies is known as SDRadar and it has the advantage of being able to change the architecture of the radar by means of programming, while keeping the same hardware [3], [4]. SDRadar has the facility of modifying parameters of RF functioning through software and has allowed researchers and scholars to experiment different low-cost radar techniques with the help of free software such as GNU-radio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%