2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02612.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis

Abstract: SummaryPlants emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that play important roles in their interaction with the environment and have a major impact on atmospheric chemistry. The development of static and dynamic techniques for headspace collection of volatiles in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis has significantly improved our understanding of the biosynthesis and ecology of plant VOCs. Advances in automated analysis of VOCs have allowed the monitoring of fast changes in VOC emissions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
428
0
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 524 publications
(467 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
1
428
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Details on isoprene analysis by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer can be found in Tholl et al (2006). Data represent means 6 SE of measurements on seven different plants.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on isoprene analysis by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometer can be found in Tholl et al (2006). Data represent means 6 SE of measurements on seven different plants.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To expose wheat to Z-3-HAC, a dynamic push-pull cuvette system was used (Tholl et al, 2006). Wheat plants were placed in one of four nalophan (Foodpack) cuvettes, each of which was assigned to one of the four above-mentioned treatments.…”
Section: Treatments and Cuvette Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the P. xylostella treatment, plants were placed with their root balls wrapped in aluminum foil in 3-L bell jars and volatiles were collected during 21 to 30 h from the start of larval feeding. Volatiles were trapped on 25 mg of Super-Q (hydroponic plants, insect feeding; Tholl et al, 2006) or 5 mg of activated charcoal (detached leaves) and eluted with 100 mL (Super-Q) or 40 mL (charcoal) of CH 2 Cl 2 containing 120 ng of nonyl acetate or 80 ng of 1-bromodecane, respectively, as an internal standard. No major differences in the volatile profiles were observed between the different trapping materials.…”
Section: Volatile Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%