2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support

Abstract: HighlightsA structured protocol for adapting a spatial ecosystem service model to local contexts is proposed.Decision context, the final users and uses of maps should drive the way the spatial ecosystem service models are structured.Simply increasing spatial resolution is not sufficient to increase legitimacy and the ultimate utility of maps.The type and level of stakeholders’ involvement is a determinant of spatial model usefulness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between two successive classes corresponds approximately to 1 °C. Opportunities for nature-based recreation in the city were assessed through a locally-adjusted version of ESTIMAP-recreation, a model originally developed for mapping ES across Europe (Zulian et al 2013;Paracchini et al 2014) and later adjusted for the application to different contexts and scales (Baró et al 2016;Liquete et al 2016;Vallecillo et al 2018;Zulian et al 2018). The model is composed of two modules.…”
Section: Mapping and Assessing Esmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between two successive classes corresponds approximately to 1 °C. Opportunities for nature-based recreation in the city were assessed through a locally-adjusted version of ESTIMAP-recreation, a model originally developed for mapping ES across Europe (Zulian et al 2013;Paracchini et al 2014) and later adjusted for the application to different contexts and scales (Baró et al 2016;Liquete et al 2016;Vallecillo et al 2018;Zulian et al 2018). The model is composed of two modules.…”
Section: Mapping and Assessing Esmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that all ecosystems are potential providers of services, this is measured by the extent and quality of citizens' access to nature [16,17]. There are indications that the type and level of stakeholder participation is important for the evaluation of CES [18]. It is significant to consider that CES should evolve over both space and time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, communicability of technical maps and documents remains a critical issue. Even if the ES approach is widely discussed on the scientific and academic stage its operationalisation at the community level is less practiced (Zulian et al 2018;Dick et al 2018), and if planners are not able to represent synergies or tradeoffs in a spatial and simplistic way (Meerow and Newell 2017;Lin et al 2018;Turkelboom et al 2015) the utilization of the scientific assessment is weak. In the work of Martinez-Harms et al (2015) the degree to which ES assessments have addressed management decisions has been evaluated, and results indicate that only 3% of studies documented how the research has been used for effective land use decision-support (Martinez-Harms et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%