2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical and technical aspects for the 3D scanning of lithic artefacts using micro-computed tomography techniques and laser light scanners for subsequent geometric morphometric analysis. Introducing the StyroStone protocol

Abstract: Here, we present a new method to scan a large number of lithic artefacts using three-dimensional scanning technology. Despite the rising use of high-resolution 3D surface scanners in archaeological sciences, no virtual studies have focused on the 3D digitization and analysis of small lithic implements such as bladelets, microblades, and microflakes. This is mostly due to difficulties in creating reliable 3D meshes of these artefacts resulting from several inherent features (i.e., size, translucency, and acute … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, the combination of global shape description with specific features of stone tool variability, such as cross-section outline and retouch angle, is particularly effective in quantifying differences in the technological procedures used to produce and further modify stone tools. The effectiveness of the new StyroStone scanning protocol [ 58 , 68 ] combined with open-source software to conduct shape assessments, such as AGMT3-D [ 53 ], will certainly facilitate future studies and provide additional evidence. This can be eventually compared with the results achieved at Fumane Cave thanks to the open-access repository containing all 3D meshes analyzed in this study [ 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Particularly, the combination of global shape description with specific features of stone tool variability, such as cross-section outline and retouch angle, is particularly effective in quantifying differences in the technological procedures used to produce and further modify stone tools. The effectiveness of the new StyroStone scanning protocol [ 58 , 68 ] combined with open-source software to conduct shape assessments, such as AGMT3-D [ 53 ], will certainly facilitate future studies and provide additional evidence. This can be eventually compared with the results achieved at Fumane Cave thanks to the open-access repository containing all 3D meshes analyzed in this study [ 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bigger blades (n = 132) were instead scanned with an Artec Spider (EVA-D-3D) structured light surface scanner and the software Artec Studio Professional 13 (Artec 3D, Luxemburg). This novel scanning routine allows archaeologists to perform more 3D-based studies on small lithic implements [ 58 ]. All 3D meshes analyzed in this paper are stored in an open-access repository available on Zenodo [ 75 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some cases, multiple objects can be scanned simultaneously using medical or micro-CT. The output Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files are then interactively surfaced and then separated into individual files and cleaned using expensive, proprietary and GUI-based software such as Slicer, Aviso, or Geomagic (Göldner, Karakostis, & Falcucci, 2022). In these cases the scanning process is efficient but at the cost of an increase in post-processing time and, like the other methods, is not conducive for efficiently creating a full set of 3D models of objects from large collections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%