2015
DOI: 10.18290/rpsych.2015.18.4-3pl
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pracoholizm – istota konstruktu i trafność nomenklatury jako aktualny problem w badaniach nad zjawiskiem. Komentarz do Staszczyk i Tokarz (2015)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Oblique rotation was also applied because it does not enforce orthogonality between variable clusters, allowing for the possibility of factor correlation and obtaining a simple structure. The analysis of the factor correlation matrix revealed that the factors were related (non-orthogonal), suggesting the presence of a latent common factor (60)(61)(62).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oblique rotation was also applied because it does not enforce orthogonality between variable clusters, allowing for the possibility of factor correlation and obtaining a simple structure. The analysis of the factor correlation matrix revealed that the factors were related (non-orthogonal), suggesting the presence of a latent common factor (60)(61)(62).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Po pierwsze, pracoholizm jest stosunkowo nowym zjawiskiem i do tej pory przeprowadzono niewiele badań empirycznych nad jego powstawaniem, rozwojem i skutkami (6). W Polsce takie badania są bardzo rzadkie, znane są mi tylko trzy ośrodki, w których się je prowadzi (2,7,8,4, [9][10][11]. Ukazała się też pierwsza książka -"Pracoholizm.…”
Section: Wprowadzenieunclassified