2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-002-0773-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prä- und postnatales Nierenscreening im Vergleich: eine Analyse von 34.450 Neugeborenen des Geburtenregisters Mainzer Modell

Abstract: Both, the prenatal as well as the postnatal ultrasonographic screening of the kidneys are ingenious examinations. The prenatal examination detects life threatening malformations of the kidneys. The postnatal examination completes early diagnosis of renal defects by uncovering the malformations, which have been missed prenatally. The prevalence of malformations of the kidney is comparable to the one of hip dislocation. We therefore conclude, that ultrasonographic screening of the kidneys is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall intervention rate in our study was 21.8%, which is in agreement with the literature, where intervention rates range from 7 and 28% [2,3,18,34]. The proportion of children who needed an intervention immediately after birth or during follow-up in our study was highest in those with the most severe forms of hydronephrosis, which is in agreement with the literature [2,6,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall intervention rate in our study was 21.8%, which is in agreement with the literature, where intervention rates range from 7 and 28% [2,3,18,34]. The proportion of children who needed an intervention immediately after birth or during follow-up in our study was highest in those with the most severe forms of hydronephrosis, which is in agreement with the literature [2,6,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The sensitivity of intrauterine diagnosis for kidney and urinary tract anomalies ranges between 35.7 and 88.5% in the literature [17,[32][33][34], but could not be calculated in our study due to the unknown number of false-negative cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Today, the use of ultrasonographic imaging has allowed great progress in diagnosing urinary system anomalies. Prenatal US screening of the urinary system proved not to be sensitive enough due to many subjective and objective factors [29,36,37]. Nevertheless, this method successfully diagnosed many cases of hydronephrosis in utero.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all CAKUT diagnosed by postnatal US screening, only 15.2% and 39% were found prenatally [29,30,38]. German authors computed the sensitivity of prenatal US screening to be 36%, and the accuracy rate was 99% [37]. This data suggests that every infant could benefit from both a prenatal and postnatal US screening of the urinary tract, as it enables prompt detection of any CAKUT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most children with CAKUT are diagnosed prenatally in developed countries, 4 5 largely because of the widespread use of fetal ultrasonography. Recently, postnatal ultrasound screening has been reported to be a useful method in the early detection and intervention of CAKUT, 6–9 as this technique can confirm abnormalities detected in the fetus and it can detect undiscovered abnormalities during the prenatal period, 5 10 which may minimise renal damage and thereby improve quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%