2021
DOI: 10.53402/ijesss.v1i3.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PQ4R-based E-LKPD to improve the fourth grade students’ higher order thinking skills

Abstract: This study is intended to analyze the need for e-LKPD development based on the preview, question, read, reflect, recite, and review (PQ4R) to improve students' HOTS. There are three syntaxes of 3-stage levels of high order thinking skills recommended by Bloom's taxonomy. It consists of analyzing, evaluating, and creating. The type of this research is a descriptive qualitative study analysis based on a literature review of e-LKPD and equipped with the PQ4R strategy as an effort to increase the HOTS of students.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Customized instructional resources, such as LKPD that are meticulously crafted to bolster scientific literacy, have demonstrated their effectiveness in not only elevating students' higher-order thinking skills but also in deepening their understanding of scientific methodologies. According to (Yulia et al, 2022), the deployment of such specialized teaching materials, including the implementation of PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, and Review) strategies within electronic LKPDs (E-LKPD), has been shown to significantly enrich the learning experience, rendering it more dynamic and interactive, thereby promoting students' engagement and cognitive development (Nirmala et al, 2021) Moreover, the ambit of scientific literacy transcends the confines of pure science to permeate diverse disciplines, including mathematics and social sciences, highlighting its interdisciplinary significance. The practicality and validity testing of LKPD through methodologies such as field trials and questionnaires have been instrumental in assessing its efficacy in bolstering students' comprehension, analytical capabilities, and problem-solving prowess (Suriani & Devita, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Customized instructional resources, such as LKPD that are meticulously crafted to bolster scientific literacy, have demonstrated their effectiveness in not only elevating students' higher-order thinking skills but also in deepening their understanding of scientific methodologies. According to (Yulia et al, 2022), the deployment of such specialized teaching materials, including the implementation of PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, and Review) strategies within electronic LKPDs (E-LKPD), has been shown to significantly enrich the learning experience, rendering it more dynamic and interactive, thereby promoting students' engagement and cognitive development (Nirmala et al, 2021) Moreover, the ambit of scientific literacy transcends the confines of pure science to permeate diverse disciplines, including mathematics and social sciences, highlighting its interdisciplinary significance. The practicality and validity testing of LKPD through methodologies such as field trials and questionnaires have been instrumental in assessing its efficacy in bolstering students' comprehension, analytical capabilities, and problem-solving prowess (Suriani & Devita, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies underscore the importance of integrating advanced methodologies in LKPD design to foster scientific literacy, especially in burgeoning fields like biotechnology. (Nirmala et al, 2021;Wulan et al, 2023) emphasized the need for electronic student worksheets incorporating scientific approaches to enhance critical thinking in biotechnology, while (Arifah et al, 2022) showcased the benefits of ethnoscience and STEM-based worksheets in boosting literacy and character development. Moreover, delineations by (Dewantara et al, 2019;M.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%