PPPs and the Changing Public Sector Ethos: Case-Study Evidence from the Health and Local Authority Sectors

Abstract

This article explores the extent to which a new contractual approach to delivering public services, through public private partnerships (PPPs), is transforming the traditional values underpinning the public sector ethos among both managers and workers. Drawing on two detailed case studies of PPPs -a Private Finance Initiative in the health sector and the outsourcing of housing benefit claims in the local government sector -we identify a range of new pressures impacting on five key elements of a traditional notion of the public sector ethos. Our findings demonstrate that the contractual relations of PPPs have led to a clear weakening of traditional notions of managerial accountability and bureaucratic behaviour, reflecting both a shift to new lines of accountability (private sector shareholders) and a vicious circle of monitoring and distrust between partner organizations, in place of the old faith in bureaucratic process. Among workers, certain traditional values -especially a concern for working in the public interest -continue to inform the way they identify with, and understand, their work in delivering public services. However, the cost cutting and work intensification associated with PPPs present a significant threat to these values.The article identifies examples of shortterm resilience of the traditional public sector ethos, as well as developments that threaten its long-term survival. KEY WORDShealth sector / local authority / public private partnerships

When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act

“…Market reforms tend to undermine the power of public service workers, but have varying effects on public-sector managers, private providers, and service users; they may empower one or more of these actors, but not all of them (Gingrich, 2011). For example, supplier opportunism in the context of Private Finance Initiative contracting in the NHS leads public-sector managers to employ detailed planning practices (Lonsdale and Watson, 2007) and hold private-sector managers accountable to contract specifications (Hebson, Grimshaw and Marchington, 2003), potentially leading to a more difficult situation for profit-making. Moreover, commissioning in English healthcare has traditionally limited competition, since patient choice and cash budgets were both strictly limited (Sheaff et al, 2013).…”

“Pembebasan” Etos Akuntabilitas Anggaran Daerah: Sebuah Analisis Kritis Habermasian Atas Kolonisasi Lifeworld

“…Nilai-nilai baru yang dibawa oleh NPM sebagian berasal dari pengakuan adanya kekuatan pasar dan kekuasaan pelanggan, yang mana hal tersebut menurut berbagai peneliti, bertentangan dengan komitmen terhadap kepentingan publik (Doig dan Wilson, 1998;Hebson et al, 2003). Nilai-nilai yang termasuk di dalamnya ialah profitabilitas, risk taking, responsif, inovasi dan bisnis (Aldridge dan Stoker, 2002; Van der Wal et al, 2008).…”

“…Terdapat bukti bahwa reformasi New Public Management memiliki dampak terhadap etos umumnya melalui penciptaan budaya audit (Power, 1997) dan secara khusus berkaitan dengan kerjasama pemerintah dengan swasta (Hebson et al, 2003) dan contracting out (Painter, 2000). Konsep NPM membatasi diskursus publik pada topik yang tidak kritis dan mengabaikan topik penting seperti pembuatan kebijakan (Stone, 2002).…”

“…Lebih lanjut, selain studi yang dilakukan oleh Pratchett dan Wingfield (1996) dan Hebson et al (2003), bukti empiris adanya etos ini sangat langka dan karakternya sangat sulit dijelaskan. Kerangka yang diidentifikasi oleh Pratchett dan Wingfield (1994) diuraikan dengan memasukkan akuntabilitas, perilaku birokratif (ditunjukkan melalui kejujuran, integritas, imparsialitas, dan objektivitas), kepentingan publik, motivasi dan loyalitas.…”

Activating the worker in elderly care: a technique and tactics of invitation

“…Dahl 2009;Thomas and Davies 2005). In Sweden, the discourse takes up a purchaser-provider model that was introduced in elderly-care in the early 1990s (see Hebson et al, 2003, in the UK). The policy argument was to increase the number of workers in the elderly-care market, with the intention of making work more effective at lower costs.…”