2015
DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.01821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PPIM: A Protein-Protein Interaction Database for Maize

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also assessed GO term enrichment for the candidate genes for each phenotype’s components and their validated and predicted interaction partners in a maize PPI network 37 using BiNGO 38 (Supplementary Tables 7, 8, and 9) and a 1% FDR threshold. This analysis provided greater insight into the different biological mechanisms by which plastic responses might influence the expression of different phenotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also assessed GO term enrichment for the candidate genes for each phenotype’s components and their validated and predicted interaction partners in a maize PPI network 37 using BiNGO 38 (Supplementary Tables 7, 8, and 9) and a 1% FDR threshold. This analysis provided greater insight into the different biological mechanisms by which plastic responses might influence the expression of different phenotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario we would expect to see evidence of interactions between candidate genes for the two phenotypes or their co-localization in similar pathways. We performed a non-exhaustive survey of a maize protein-protein interaction network 37 and found predicted interactions between some pairs of candidate genes for the mean and plasticity of the same phenotype (unpublished results), a result that is at least consistent with “mediated pleiotropy”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result can be attributed to either biased GOBP annotations toward evolutionarily conserved processes rather than plant-specific ones in maize, or biased availability of high-quality functional genomics data toward animals and yeast. Subsequently, we compared MaizeNet with other maize gene networks based on the protein-protein interaction database for maize (PPIM) (Zhu et al, 2016), gene coexpression (GCN) (Huang et al, 2017) and integration of multiple types of interactions (STRING10.5) (Szklarczyk et al, 2017) (Table 2). This comparison revealed that the range of AUROC (FPR < 0.01) for MaizeNet was significantly higher than that of the other maize gene networks (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test) ( Figure 2b), thereby indicating that MaizeNet is among the most predictive gene networks for biological processes in maize.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Predictive Power Of Maizenetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing the need for a more comprehensive plant interactome, several computational methods have been used to infer genome‐wide PPI networks using a variety of strategies (Cui et al ., ; Lin et al ., ; Wang et al ., , ; Szklarczyk et al ., ; Zhu et al ., ). For instance, Gu et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%