“…Critically, the PRDP model suggests the "phenotypic switch" for persistence is predicated on the number of ribosomes inactivated; hence, only a small subpopulation of stressed cells become persistent since they are the cells with a threshold level of ribosomes inactivated (Song and Wood, 2020a;Wood and Song, 2020); i.e., not all stationary cells are persisters since not all of these cells have a large enough percentage of ribosomes inactivated. The PRDP model is general in that it is applicable to how persister cells form from various stresses since RMF has been shown to increase persistence dramatically in E. coli for myriad stresses including (i) ampicillin (Song and Wood, 2020b), ciprofloxacin (Song and Wood, 2020b), netilmicin (Tkachenko et al, 2017), gentamicin (McKay and Portnoy, 2015), acid (El-Sharoud and Niven, 2007), osmotic stress (Shcherbakova et al, 2015), and nutrient limitation (Yamagishi et al, 1993;Bubunenko et al, 2007). Furthermore, since RMF (Prossliner et al, 2018) and HflX (Basu and Yap, 2017) are conserved in bacteria, and Hpf is distributed in several kingdoms (i.e., prokaryotes and plants) (Akiyama et al, 2018), the PRDP model is probably applicable for the formation of the persister cells of many species.…”