2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PPDL: Predicate Probability Distribution based Loss for Unbiased Scene Graph Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21,33,39,42,43]. Recently, a number of papers have identified the long-tailed distribution in image scene graphs and focused on generating unbiased scene graphs [8,9,[15][16][17]41]. We seek to bring the same problem to light in the video domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,33,39,42,43]. Recently, a number of papers have identified the long-tailed distribution in image scene graphs and focused on generating unbiased scene graphs [8,9,[15][16][17]41]. We seek to bring the same problem to light in the video domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods suffered from head-biased predictions due to the inherent imbalance of predicates. In recent years, several unbiased approaches [20]- [24], [26]- [28], [35]- [41] have been proposed to address this problem. For example, TDE [20] uses causal analysis to eliminate prediction bias, Cogtree [22] employs cognitive tree loss for unbiased prediction, while BGNN [24] balances head and tail predicates through bi-level re-sampling.…”
Section: Related Work a Unbiased Scene Graph Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate our proposed method on VG150, our approach combines four classical SGG models to represent predicate features, namely Motifs [29], VCTree [30], Transformer [49] and PENet [31], as shown in Table II. The results of the state-of-the-art methods that are being compared are divided into various debiased methods [20], [22], [26]- [28], [35], [57], [58], [60], [61] on classical models and specific SGG models [21], [23], [24], [27], [32], [56], [59].…”
Section: Comparison With State Of the Arts A) Vg150mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-tailed data distribution has been a key challenge in visual recognition [41], and it has been addressed in the recent literature on SGG [42]. In order to tackle this problem, various approaches have been proposed, such as data resampling [43], [44], [45], [46], de-biasing [16], [47], [48], [49], [50], and loss modification [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57]. De-biasing methods require pre-trained biased models for initialization and then finetune the model.…”
Section: Long-tailed Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%