2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00631-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PPDIST, global 0.1° daily and 3-hourly precipitation probability distribution climatologies for 1979–2018

Abstract: We introduce the Precipitation Probability DISTribution (PPDIST) dataset, a collection of global high-resolution (0.1°) observation-based climatologies (1979–2018) of the occurrence and peak intensity of precipitation (P) at daily and 3-hourly time-scales. The climatologies were produced using neural networks trained with daily P observations from 93,138 gauges and hourly P observations (resampled to 3-hourly) from 11,881 gauges worldwide. Mean validation coefficient of determination (R2) values ranged from 0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the analysis of seasonality is fully consistent between CHIRPS and ERA5, the results of the correlation analysis between floods, annual maximum rainfall and soil moisture time series reveals some differences between the two rainfall products (Figure S5). ERA5 can overestimate precipitation occurrence and underestimate extremes (Beck et al, 2020), while CHIRPS is sensitive to changes in the rain gauge station network over time, leading to time‐varying systematic errors (Harrison et al., 2019). Additional issues are related to the use of gridded precipitation products with averaging effects resulting in the underestimation of extremes (Ensor & Robeson, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the analysis of seasonality is fully consistent between CHIRPS and ERA5, the results of the correlation analysis between floods, annual maximum rainfall and soil moisture time series reveals some differences between the two rainfall products (Figure S5). ERA5 can overestimate precipitation occurrence and underestimate extremes (Beck et al, 2020), while CHIRPS is sensitive to changes in the rain gauge station network over time, leading to time‐varying systematic errors (Harrison et al., 2019). Additional issues are related to the use of gridded precipitation products with averaging effects resulting in the underestimation of extremes (Ensor & Robeson, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quality-controlled data has been used to develop UK-wide gridded 1 km resolution hourly precipitation products [22], blended gauge-radar-satellite datasets [23] and to examine the ability of hourly gauge data to capture hourly rainfall extremes [24]. The GSDR has also been used, together with reanalyses and remotely sensed products, to produce global 0.1° daily and 3-hourly precipitation probability distribution climatologies for 1979–2018 [25]. These are added to existing merged products as a key resource for the community to validate climate model outputs [13] and provide a significant platform to guide future model development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This threshold was also chosen based on results from published literature indicating 40mm represents an ~10 year return level for 3hr rainfall across central Europe and a >10 year return level in northern Europe. Beck et al (2020) showed a 15-year return-period intensity for 3-hour rainfall of ~16mm in northern Europe and ~30-40mm in southern and central Europe, while Poschlod et al (2021) found 10-yr return levels for 3hr rainfall of ~35-45mm in central Europe and ~20-30mm in the UK and Scandinavia, using a high-resolution single- model large ensemble climate model. Therefore, this threshold represents potentially impactful events across the region under investigation.…”
Section: Rainfall Datamentioning
confidence: 98%