Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the extended emission in halos is correlated with the mass of the dark matter halo that provides the gravitational potential well in which the galaxies reside (White & Frenk 1991;Kereš et al 2005;van de Voort et al 2011;Correa et al 2018). Studies show that even the stellar mass in galaxies is correlated with the host dark matter halo mass (e.g., Moster et al 2010;Shankar et al 2014;Chiu et al 2016). Observations suggest that pointed X-ray emission in galaxies too are correlated with stellar luminosity and stellar mass thereof (e.g., Forman et al 1985;Trinchieri & Fabbiano 1985;Canizares et al 1987;Sarazin et al 2000;Strickland et al 2002;Kim & Fabbiano 2003;Sivakoff et al 2003;Fab-FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the extended emission in halos is correlated with the mass of the dark matter halo that provides the gravitational potential well in which the galaxies reside (White & Frenk 1991;Kereš et al 2005;van de Voort et al 2011;Correa et al 2018). Studies show that even the stellar mass in galaxies is correlated with the host dark matter halo mass (e.g., Moster et al 2010;Shankar et al 2014;Chiu et al 2016). Observations suggest that pointed X-ray emission in galaxies too are correlated with stellar luminosity and stellar mass thereof (e.g., Forman et al 1985;Trinchieri & Fabbiano 1985;Canizares et al 1987;Sarazin et al 2000;Strickland et al 2002;Kim & Fabbiano 2003;Sivakoff et al 2003;Fab-FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly introduce the likelihood and fitting framework below and refer the reader to previous publications for more details (Liu et al 2015;Chiu et al 2016c). This likelihood is designed to obtain the parameters of the targeted X-ray observable-mass-redshift scaling relation (e.g., r X ) for a given sample that is selected using another observable (e.g., the SPT signal-to-noise ξ), for which the observable-mass-redshift relation is already known (e.g., equation (3) used in this work).…”
Section: Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have verified that this likelihood recovers unbiased scaling relation parameters by testing it against large mocks (> 1300 clusters). Moreover, it has been further optimized in the goal of obtaining the parameters of scaling relations in a high dimensional space (Chiu et al 2016c). We note that in each iteration of the chain we use the current value of R 500 for each cluster to recalculate the M ICM (see Section 3.2).…”
Section: Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we assume an underlying N-M relation characterized by its log-normal intrinsic scatter at fixed mass and evaluate the probability of observing the weak-lensing magnification signal for a given richness. This method has been widely used in previous work to calibrate the observable-to-mass relation of a cluster sample with a well-defined selection function (Chiu et al 2016b;Chiu et al 2018a;Bulbul et al 2018). In addition, the effects of Malmquist and Eddington bias are fully accounted for in this approach.…”
Section: Modelling Of the Scaling Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%