1984
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90283-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pp and ̄pp elastic scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
212
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
11
212
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Following tradition [18], it is a customary practice to adopt a linear Pomeron trajectory in order to describe hadronic interactions. In a different approach [7,19] that provides a satisfactory fit to pp and pp data a square root trajectory similar to that of Eq.…”
Section: Pomeron Universalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following tradition [18], it is a customary practice to adopt a linear Pomeron trajectory in order to describe hadronic interactions. In a different approach [7,19] that provides a satisfactory fit to pp and pp data a square root trajectory similar to that of Eq.…”
Section: Pomeron Universalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, with the energy increase it became obvious that the experimental data do not obey the GCF pomeron: Kaidalov and Ter-Martirosyan (KT) [2] suggested a supercritical pomeron with an intercept α P (0) = 1 + ∆ where ∆ > 0, that gives σ tot ∼ s ∆ ; in fitting to data the magnitude ∆ ≃ 0.12 was found. Donnachie and Landshoff (DL) [3] succeeded in the description of a wide range of experimental data on the diffractive processes using a supercritical pomeron with ∆ ≃ 0.08. As was obvious from the very beginning, the one-pomeron exchange amplitude with ∆ ∼ 0.1 (KTDL pomeron) is applicable in a restricted region of energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naively, the problem of extending the model to the region of higher energies looked rather simple: one should introduce ∆ of the order of 0.1, following the suggestion of Refs. [2,3], and evaluate the corrections related to the two-pomeron exchange (these corrections are to be taken into account, because elastic and diffractive cross sections, σ el and σ DD , are determined by the imaginary parts of the two-pomeron exchange diagrams, and they are not small). However, the realization of this program with ∆ ≃ 0.08 faced a phenomenon which may be called a hidden unitarity violation: the description of experimental data with both one-pomeron ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those experiments, however, did not measure the polarization of the projectiles. Since the differential cross section (dσ/dt) at ISR energies is usually assumed to be dominated by the spin-non-flip amplitude, many of the models describing the diffraction in pp scattering do not take into account the contribution from spin-flip amplitudes [2,3,4]. Others do [5,6,7,8] but in this case they use data at lower energies [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%