2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00282.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

POY version 4: phylogenetic analysis using dynamic homologies

Abstract: We present POY version 4, an open source program for the phylogenetic analysis of morphological, prealigned sequence, unaligned sequence, and genomic data. POY allows phylogenetic inference when not only substitutions, but insertions, deletions, and rearrangement events are allowed (computed using the breakpoint or inversion distance). Compared with previous versions, POY 4 provides greater flexibility, a larger number of supported parameter sets, numerous execution time improvements, a vastly improved user in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
157
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
157
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13, and analysed under direct optimization 28,29 with POY v. 4 (ref. 30) under three parameter sets, including equal weights and two sets with differential indel opening and extension costs (indel opening = 3, indel extension = 1), one with equal weights for all nucleotide transformations (3,221) and another with differential weights for transversions and transitions (3,211). A search strategy consisting of a timed search (2 h with TBR branch swapping and tree fusing) was used to save an initial set of trees, which were later used as input trees for an analysis with auto_sequence_partition 1 .…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analyses Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13, and analysed under direct optimization 28,29 with POY v. 4 (ref. 30) under three parameter sets, including equal weights and two sets with differential indel opening and extension costs (indel opening = 3, indel extension = 1), one with equal weights for all nucleotide transformations (3,221) and another with differential weights for transversions and transitions (3,211). A search strategy consisting of a timed search (2 h with TBR branch swapping and tree fusing) was used to save an initial set of trees, which were later used as input trees for an analysis with auto_sequence_partition 1 .…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analyses Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene sequences were downloaded from Genbank (Benson et al, 2004) and aligned using the default settings in MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004). The analysis was performed under maximum parsimony criterion using POY 4.1.2 (Varon et al, 2010). All morphological characters were unordered and weighted equally.…”
Section: Phylogeny and Comparison With Other Early Cretaceous Frogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the arguments of Padial et al (2014), we employed tree-alignment (e.g., Sankoff, 1975;Wheeler, 1996;Wheeler, 2012, 2013) in POY 4.1.3 (Varón et al, 2010), which tests hypotheses of nucleotide homology dynamically by optimizing unaligned DNA sequences directly onto alternative topologies (Kluge and Grant, 2006;Wheeler et al, 2006;Grant and Kluge, 2009) while simultaneously optimizing prealigned transformation series as standard static matrices.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%