Proceedings of the 39th International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2608628.2608664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Powers of tensors and fast matrix multiplication

Abstract: This paper presents a method to analyze the powers of a given trilinear form (a special kind of algebraic constructions also called a tensor) and obtain upper bounds on the asymptotic complexity of matrix multiplication. Compared with existing approaches, this method is based on convex optimization, and thus has polynomial-time complexity. As an application, we use this method to study powers of the construction given by Coppersmith and Winograd [Journal of Symbolic Computation, 1990] and obtain the upper bou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
620
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 767 publications
(624 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
620
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We let ω be a feasible exponent for linear algebra, in the sense that matrices of size n can be multiplied in O(n ω ) base ring operations over any ring; the best bound to date is ω < 2.38 [16,31]. We will have to compute rank and rank pro le of dense matrices; the cost reduces to that of matrix multiplication [25].…”
Section: Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We let ω be a feasible exponent for linear algebra, in the sense that matrices of size n can be multiplied in O(n ω ) base ring operations over any ring; the best bound to date is ω < 2.38 [16,31]. We will have to compute rank and rank pro le of dense matrices; the cost reduces to that of matrix multiplication [25].…”
Section: Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best known value for ω is ω < 2.38 [32]; in the often discussed case where p is constant, the cost is then O(n 4.76p ). For the CDT problem, we have p = 3, so that generic instances of it can be solved using O(n 14.28 ) arithmetic operations.…”
Section: Minimization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a ⊕-Feistel, the cost of solving the linear system is 2 3n with Gaussian elimination, but can be improved to O(2 2.81n ) with Strassen's Algorithm (the currently best known algorithm [25] has complexity only O(2 2.3729n ) but is probably more expensive for practical values of n.)…”
Section: Integral Attackmentioning
confidence: 99%