Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1002/er.3475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power to the people or regulatory ratcheting? Explaining the success (or failure) of attempts to site commercial US nuclear power plants: 1954-1996

Abstract: Between 1954 and 1996, more than 200 nuclear power projects were publicly announced in the USA. Barely half of these projects were completed and generated power commercially. Existing research has highlighted a number of potential explanations for the varying siting outcomes of these projects, including contentious political protests, socioeconomic and political conditions within potential host communities, regulatory changes ('ratcheting'), and cost overruns. However, questions remain about which of these fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How these various stakeholders and the public view and frame power generation issues and their contexts provides a very direct test of our model's performance. Recent scholars of the politics of power generation facilities, in both the United States and abroad, directly discuss the role of plant costs, efficiency, safety, and environmental impacts as core elements in the framing of stakeholder and citizen support and oppositional attitudes and policy preferences (see, e.g., Berndt & Aldrich, 2016;Joseph, 2009;Mix & Waldo, 2015;Moore & Hackett, 2016;Powell, 2015). A body of literature indicates that individual characteristics, energy source perceptions, and citizens' risk attitudes are also correlated with public energy policy preferences (Ansolabehere & Konisky, 2009;Greenberg, 2009).…”
Section: Data Collection and Variable Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How these various stakeholders and the public view and frame power generation issues and their contexts provides a very direct test of our model's performance. Recent scholars of the politics of power generation facilities, in both the United States and abroad, directly discuss the role of plant costs, efficiency, safety, and environmental impacts as core elements in the framing of stakeholder and citizen support and oppositional attitudes and policy preferences (see, e.g., Berndt & Aldrich, 2016;Joseph, 2009;Mix & Waldo, 2015;Moore & Hackett, 2016;Powell, 2015). A body of literature indicates that individual characteristics, energy source perceptions, and citizens' risk attitudes are also correlated with public energy policy preferences (Ansolabehere & Konisky, 2009;Greenberg, 2009).…”
Section: Data Collection and Variable Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%