Power, recovery and doing something worthwhile: A thematic analysis of expert patient perspectives in psychiatry education

Abstract

Background Patient involvement in psychiatry education is required by policy and has many benefits for students. Little research has focused on the impact on expert patients (EPs). Objective This study aimed to explore the impact of involvement in psychiatry education on mental health patients. Design A qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews was conducted in a psychiatry teaching unit in the East Midlands, UK. A purposive sample of 20 EPs involved in teaching was interviewed about the social and psychological impacts of involvement. Transcripts were analysed thematically and a coding scheme was developed. Results Five themes were identified: shaping the doctors of the future—something worthwhile, challenging assumptions about mental health, recovery and transformation, vulnerability and support and expertise and power. Conclusion These EPs benefitted from their experience of teaching. Involvement in psychiatry teaching may require putting oneself in a vulnerable position, but a supportive and open faculty team may mitigate this challenge. The Expert Patient Programme was seen as a way of helping to reduce the power difference between patients and doctors in the future. There is a need to examine the language that we use to talk about patient involvement as this may have implications for this power dynamic. The context and mechanisms that lead to the benefits described by participants should be studied so that these benefits may be generalized to other contexts. Patient Contribution An EP was involved in the planning and ethical approval application process of the project and the drafting and approval of this manuscript.

Mental health nursing capability development: Perspectives of consumers and supporters

“…Having lived experience education experts influences future professional identity and triggers transformational learning (Ward et al . 2022). Additionally, it fosters hopeful recovery‐orientated attitudes and reduces theory‐practice gaps for students (Jack 2020).…”

Lack of awareness of neurogastroenterology and motility within medical education: Time to fill the gap

“…It may also be helpful for medical students and postgraduates to be exposed to expert patients with lived experience of DGBI, which is an approach that has been shown to improve learner satisfaction, improve communication skills, and enhance empathy toward patients. 28 One approach to designing the postgraduate gastroenterology curriculum has been proposed by the American (ANMS) and European (ESNM) Societies of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 29 The proposed three-tiered competency-based curriculum provides an overview of skills that trainees should acquire over the course of their career, with a deeper understanding of NGM as the tiers ascend.…”

“…Moreover, a more holistic understanding of the patient perspective could foster interest among trainees toward the psychosocial approach of DGBI management. It may also be helpful for medical students and postgraduates to be exposed to expert patients with lived experience of DGBI, which is an approach that has been shown to improve learner satisfaction, improve communication skills, and enhance empathy toward patients 28 …”

‘We only come from one perspective’: Exploring experiences of allies supporting expert by experience leadership in mental health education

“…Marginalisation and stigmatisation extend to health professional education, where mental health service user (referred to as Experts by Experience (EBE)) involvement remains rare and often tokenistic, despite the support of such (Happell et al, 2015; Scanlan et al, 2020; Soon et al, 2020, 2022). There is evidence of benefits to students, health professional academics and the EBE themselves (Happell, O'Donovan, Sharrock, et al, 2022; Towle et al, 2016; Ward et al, 2022), with the recognition that EBE leadership can positively shape the attitudes and perceptions of future health professionals towards mental health service users (Happell et al, 2019; Newton‐Howes et al, 2020; Ridley et al, 2017; Soon et al, 2022; Taylor & Gordon, 2021).…”