2022
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2021.3107515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Plant Model Parameter Calibration Using Conditional Variational Autoencoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the operational costs are chosen based on the NREL ATB file [3] for the year 2050 assuming a capacity factor of 88%, 12%, and 12% for DG8, DG13, and DG30 respectively. More information regarding the power plant parameter identification can be found in [27] [28]. In addition to the cost related parameters, ramp rate limits as well as fixed no-load costs of DGs were considered.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the operational costs are chosen based on the NREL ATB file [3] for the year 2050 assuming a capacity factor of 88%, 12%, and 12% for DG8, DG13, and DG30 respectively. More information regarding the power plant parameter identification can be found in [27] [28]. In addition to the cost related parameters, ramp rate limits as well as fixed no-load costs of DGs were considered.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep Variational Autoencoder has been used to calibrate hydro generator models [17]. The approach showed very promising results on many parameters (18 parameters) but still needs multiple events to be reliable.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the model calibration efficiency, researchers conducted sensitivity analyses to reduce the problem complexity by eliminating the least impactful parameters by quantifying and comparing the sensitivity of each parameter. The most sensitive parameters have the highest impact on the model while low sensitivity parameters have a small impact on model responses [5], [12], [17], [18], [29]. Our researched power plants included a GENROU (for machine), ESST1A (for exciter), GGOV1 (for governor), and PSS2A (for PSS), with 82 parameters in total.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where C(• ∥ •) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence between two distributions and can not be negative. Now, the ELBO can be optimized via stochastic gradient descent algorithm [19], [20]. IV.…”
Section: A Cvae For Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%