2009
DOI: 10.1606/1044-3894.3921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power, Pathological Worldviews, and the Strengths Perspective in Social Work

Abstract: This article takes up Blundo's (2001) assertion in this journal that in order to practice from the strengths perspective, social workers need to alter their "frames. " Expanding on this assertion, we specify a particular frame that requires change: a pathological worldview. Examining the strengths perspective with regard to a Foucauldian analysis of power, we argue that to thoroughly implement the strengths perspective, we need to consider the dividing practices that allow us to maintain power and that reflect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saleebey, 2001;Sanders & Munford, 2006;Sousa et al, 2006;Grant & Cadell, 2009) (i) the diagnosis is centred on the possibility of building paths for change, focusing on family expertise, skills and resources and on professionals ability to increase these strengths; (ii) the intervention is developed collaboratively, placing the whole intervention system (agencies, families, professionals and the community) at the forefront of change and (iii) the desired outcome centres on agreeing a way to improve the client's well-being. The main benefit of practice founded on collaboration is to improve the outcomes for families, professionals, agencies and communities by providing what families feel they need and desire for themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saleebey, 2001;Sanders & Munford, 2006;Sousa et al, 2006;Grant & Cadell, 2009) (i) the diagnosis is centred on the possibility of building paths for change, focusing on family expertise, skills and resources and on professionals ability to increase these strengths; (ii) the intervention is developed collaboratively, placing the whole intervention system (agencies, families, professionals and the community) at the forefront of change and (iii) the desired outcome centres on agreeing a way to improve the client's well-being. The main benefit of practice founded on collaboration is to improve the outcomes for families, professionals, agencies and communities by providing what families feel they need and desire for themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This standpoint identifies the resilience of groups or individuals and gives emphasis on strength, potentials, opportunities, and knowledge instead of looking for the limitations (Grant and Cadell, 2009). It is from this perspective that strengths-based approach is comprehended to diverge from traditional deficit models (Natalie, 2011).…”
Section: Guiding Strategic Principles/mechanisms For Developing Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This engendered a sense of respect, caring and connection, and was an integrative idea in that it helped workers to accept that clients had both negative and positive features. As suggested by Grant and Cadell (2009), normalising worker and client struggles as part of the human condition was important to sustaining the strengths-based relationship. A humanistic orientation has always been part of strengths-based practice; as Kisthardt (2012) said, 'by realizing that there is more in our shared experience as human beings that make providers more like participants than different from them, we gain the courage to be warm, caring, empathic, and genuinely affirming of people's own visions' (p. 66).…”
Section: Balancing Partnership and Paternalismmentioning
confidence: 99%