2005
DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1701_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Over, Power With, and Power to Relations: Critical Reflections on Public Relations, the Dominant Coalition, and Activism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
119
0
23

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
119
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been found in the UK parliament at Westminster (HL Paper 7, 2009), civil service GIOs are often viewed and feel themselves to be increasingly de-valued and undermined in their efforts to effectively communicate their department's policy decisions to the general public. It is clear from our findings, that the pre-devolution 'dominant coalition' (Berger, 2009) recovering from a violent conflict. Moreover, while some journalists may benefit from better 24 access to government in this new political context they may find themselves pressurised to limit their scrutinising role in order to maintain their privileged access, again a situation which is not conducive to transparent governance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…As has been found in the UK parliament at Westminster (HL Paper 7, 2009), civil service GIOs are often viewed and feel themselves to be increasingly de-valued and undermined in their efforts to effectively communicate their department's policy decisions to the general public. It is clear from our findings, that the pre-devolution 'dominant coalition' (Berger, 2009) recovering from a violent conflict. Moreover, while some journalists may benefit from better 24 access to government in this new political context they may find themselves pressurised to limit their scrutinising role in order to maintain their privileged access, again a situation which is not conducive to transparent governance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Whistleblowing has been studied most extensively in public relations as one of several "dissent" tactics that, along with leaking information, public relations practitioners may use to influence their organizations (Berger, 2005;Berger & Reber, 2006;Kang & Berger, 2010;Kang, Berger, & Shin, 2012). In the Berger and Reber (2006) studies, only 4% said they would blow the whistle on an illegal activity, and only 1% said they would use hot lines or audit committees to report illegal activity.…”
Section: Whistleblowing and Dissentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication managers, hence, should be involved in decision making at the highest possible level, often by the top executives who are in control of management and thus referred to as the dominant coalition. The whole process is termed ''empowerment'' (Holtzhausen and Voto 2002;Berger 2005;Grunig 2006). Although communication managers nominally vote in policy decisions made by the dominant coalition, their specialized role in the decision making is practically no more than that of a communicator, who communicates the views of publics as well as the likely consequences of policy decisions to other senior managers after communicating with various publics potentially affected by the policy.…”
Section: Research Questions and A Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%