2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2018.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power monoids: A bridge between factorization theory and arithmetic combinatorics

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alon [1] used probabilistic arguments combined with spectral techniques to improve earlier bounds by Green [8] on the maximal cardinality of subsets of a cyclic group of prime order that cannot be expressed as a sumset. Fan and Tringali [4] use tools from factorization theory to give (among other results) necessary and sufficient conditions for certain subsets of integers to be written as sumsets in more than one way. Selfridge and Straus [10] showed that the representation function r A (n) = |{(a, a ′ ) ∈ A × A : n = a + a ′ }| of a subset A in a field of characteristic zero determines the set.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alon [1] used probabilistic arguments combined with spectral techniques to improve earlier bounds by Green [8] on the maximal cardinality of subsets of a cyclic group of prime order that cannot be expressed as a sumset. Fan and Tringali [4] use tools from factorization theory to give (among other results) necessary and sufficient conditions for certain subsets of integers to be written as sumsets in more than one way. Selfridge and Straus [10] showed that the representation function r A (n) = |{(a, a ′ ) ∈ A × A : n = a + a ′ }| of a subset A in a field of characteristic zero determines the set.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We end this subsection with a class of monoids stemming from additive combinatorics. [31,9,89]). For simplicity of presentation, we restrict ourselves to P fin (N 0 ) and to P fin,0 (N 0 ) consisting of all finite nonempty subsets of N 0 containing 0.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [5, Remarks 2.17-2.20] for a critical comparison of these definitions with analogous ones from the literature on factorization theory: In particular, a weak transfer homomorphism in the sense of [1, Definition 2.1] is an essentially surjective equimorphism, by [5,Remark 2.19].…”
Section: A Focus On Systems Of Sets Of Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject developed out of algebraic number theory, and a turning point in its history has been the crucial observation, which can be traced back to the early work of F. Halter-Koch and A. Geroldinger in the area, that questions of non-unique factorization in integral domains are purely multiplicative in nature and, hence, can be conveniently rephrased in the language of monoids, with the latter providing "canonical models" of the phenomena under consideration that would not be available otherwise [10]. It is, however, only in recent years that fundamental aspects of factorization theory have been systematically extended to non-commutative or non-cancellative settings, see [2,9,5] and references therein. Notably, an impetus to these developments has come from a more profound comprehension of the interplay between factorization theory and arithmetic combinatorics, which is also the leitmotif of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%