2018
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2018.2870518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Minimizer Symbol-Level Precoding: A Closed-Form Sub-Optimal Solution

Abstract: In this letter, we study the optimal solution of the multiuser symbol-level precoding (SLP) for minimization of the total transmit power under given signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) constraints. Adopting the distance preserving constructive interference regions (DPCIR), we first derive a simplified reformulation of the problem. Then, we analyze the structure of the optimal solution using the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions, thereby we obtain the necessary and sufficient condition u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Γ and Ξ are the corresponding SINR and EH demands, as represented in (4) and (5), respectively. In the case ofĤ = H, the SINRs of the received symbols are linearly related to Γ and the EH demand metrics are linearly related to Ξ:…”
Section: Direct Demand Slp Design For Swiptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Γ and Ξ are the corresponding SINR and EH demands, as represented in (4) and (5), respectively. In the case ofĤ = H, the SINRs of the received symbols are linearly related to Γ and the EH demand metrics are linearly related to Ξ:…”
Section: Direct Demand Slp Design For Swiptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the dominant arithmetic operations in (10), (11) and (12), i.e., 2K vector multiplications and two matrix pseudo-inversions, result in computation costs of order KN and N (L 2 1 + L 2 2 ), respectively, for the proposed method. Remark that the closed-form solution in [13] can be implemented in an equivalent way using (10) and (12); therefore we assess the complexity of [13] based on the method of this paper.…”
Section: B Computational Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To derive the closed-form algorithm to solve the optimization problem (11), we firstly address only the constraint C1 of the problem and then expand the approach to deal with the constraints C1, C2, C3 and C4 jointly. The optimization problem (11) with the constraint C1 has a form of a nonnegative least squares (NNLS) problem. It can be solved using iterative Fast NNLS algorithm [18], [19].…”
Section: Closed-form Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%