2000 IEEE International Conference on Communications. ICC 2000. Global Convergence Through Communications. Conference Record
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2000.853748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power management for throughput enhancement in wireless ad-hoc networks

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper we introduce the notion of power management within the context of wireless ad-hoc networks. More specifically, we investigate the effects of using different transmit powers on the average power consumption and end-to-end network throughput in a wireless ad-hoc environment. This power management approach would help in reducing the system power consumption and hence prolonging the battery life of mobile nodes. Furthermore, it improves the end-to-end network throughput as compared to other … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
75
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The plot of average received signal level (RSSL) against distance is presented in Figure 8. Figure 9 shows the rate of battery depletion when normal LEACH protocol [14], where a head is selected based only on highest residual energy, was running; while Figure 10 shows the rate of battery depletion when CHAR algorithm [15], where a head is selected based on two parameter highest residual energy and cost of transmission to the base station, was running. In order to evaluate numerical value of the performance of the CHAR and LEACH routing protocols in terms of energy conservation, Figure 11 presents the mean values of battery voltage for all batteries against system life for the two routing protocols.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plot of average received signal level (RSSL) against distance is presented in Figure 8. Figure 9 shows the rate of battery depletion when normal LEACH protocol [14], where a head is selected based only on highest residual energy, was running; while Figure 10 shows the rate of battery depletion when CHAR algorithm [15], where a head is selected based on two parameter highest residual energy and cost of transmission to the base station, was running. In order to evaluate numerical value of the performance of the CHAR and LEACH routing protocols in terms of energy conservation, Figure 11 presents the mean values of battery voltage for all batteries against system life for the two routing protocols.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point the printed circuit and the paper gets stuck on the copper board, we now gently removed the paper sticking to the board leaving a toner print/trace of the circuit and the board was now etched. At this point, perforations were made and components attached to arrive at the ready to use printed circuit board as shown in In other to demonstrate that the hardware was working as expected, the WSN algorithms developed in [14] and [15] were compiled and downloaded into the chip for testing as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Circuit Printing On Copper and Etchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15] a similar degree constraint is enforced to ensure a bound on the endto-end throughput. In [16] COMPOW protocol and its architecture are discussed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less transmit power means less interference to the rest of the network. This usually results in a higher signal to interference and noise ratio (SINR) at receiver nodes and therefore higher data rates [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%