2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(00)00464-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power laws in cities population, financial markets and internet sites (scaling in systems with a variable number of components)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
102
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, this normalization does not change the exponent of the power law distribution of sizes, if it exists. Furthermore, elaborating on Krugman (1996)'s argument about the non-convergence of the distribution of firm sizes toward Zipf's law in Simon (1955)'s model, Blank and Solomon (2000) have shown that Gabaix (1999)'s argument suffers from a more technical problem. Based on the demonstration that the two limits, the number of firms N → ∞ and s min (t)/Ω(t) → 0 4 (or equivalently the limit of large times t → ∞) are noncommutative, Blank and Solomon (2000) showed that Zipf's exponent m = 1 as obtained by Gabaix (1999)'s argument requires (i) taking the long time limit s min (t)/Ω(t) → 0 over which the economy made of a large but finite number N firms grows without bounds, while simul-…”
Section: Comparison With Gabaix's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, this normalization does not change the exponent of the power law distribution of sizes, if it exists. Furthermore, elaborating on Krugman (1996)'s argument about the non-convergence of the distribution of firm sizes toward Zipf's law in Simon (1955)'s model, Blank and Solomon (2000) have shown that Gabaix (1999)'s argument suffers from a more technical problem. Based on the demonstration that the two limits, the number of firms N → ∞ and s min (t)/Ω(t) → 0 4 (or equivalently the limit of large times t → ∞) are noncommutative, Blank and Solomon (2000) showed that Zipf's exponent m = 1 as obtained by Gabaix (1999)'s argument requires (i) taking the long time limit s min (t)/Ω(t) → 0 over which the economy made of a large but finite number N firms grows without bounds, while simul-…”
Section: Comparison With Gabaix's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blank and Solomon (2000) showed that this inconsistency can be resolved by allowing the number of firms to grow proportionally to the total size of the economy.…”
Section: Comparison With Gabaix's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the huge literature dealing with firms' exit available in economics, models of firm dynamics adding an exit process to multiplicative growth use rather unplausible exit mechanisms, that is they assume that firms exit as they reach a minimum size [12] or that the number of exits is time-invariantly proportional to the total population of firms [13]. Note that none of the reasons for exit listed above are by themselves fully compatible with neither the minimum size nor with the proportionality assumptions.…”
Section: Evidence On the Bad Debt Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, recent research [12,13] has shown that power laws naturally emerge from systems where a random multiplicative process is combined with the entry end exit of systems' components. While simulations show that results are robust to different specifications for entry and exit mechanisms, scarce attention has been paid so far to understand how realistic such processes are.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This one may be vulnerable to the frequency analysis, but can also resist to, [1]. The client may help, e.g., through decoy values, obfuscating power laws possibly serving disclosures, [2]. To get best of both worlds an approach perhaps practical is to use Paillier's scheme and a deterministic encryption like AES on every column subject to both: value expressions and SPJ-queries, [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%