2014
DOI: 10.1137/130911391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power-Law Approximation under Differential Constraints

Abstract: We study the Γ-convergence of the power-law functionals Fp(V) = Ω f p (x, V (x))dx 1/p , as p tends to +∞, in the setting of constant-rank operator A. We show that the Γ-limit is given by a supremal functional on L ∞ (Ω; M d×N) ∩ KerA where M d×N is the space of d × N real matrices. We give an explicit representation formula for the supremand function. We provide some examples and as application of the Γ-convergence results we characterize the strength set in the context of electrical resistivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude this section with the following lemma, already shown in [1] when f = f (x, ξ) is a Carathéodory integrand (see Lemma 4.5 therein). For the reader's convenience we report here the proof.…”
Section: γ-Convergencementioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conclude this section with the following lemma, already shown in [1] when f = f (x, ξ) is a Carathéodory integrand (see Lemma 4.5 therein). For the reader's convenience we report here the proof.…”
Section: γ-Convergencementioning
confidence: 76%
“…In [11] the authors consider the case when f (x, ξ) = a(x)|ξ| while in [1] the Γ-convergence is studied in the wider class of A ∞ -quasiconvex function f (see Definition 3.2 therein). These results have been extended in [10] in the setting of variable exponent Lebesgue space when f (x, •) is quasiconvex in the sense of Morrey.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] it has been introduced the class of functions f : R d×N → [0, +∞) satisfying f = lim p→∞ (Q(f p )) Proof of Theorem 1.2. The proof will be achieved in several steps, some of them follow along the lines of [5, Proof of Theorem 4.2].…”
Section: The L P -Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25] the last assumption is dropped and the level convexity of the relaxed functional is proved for a class of discontinuos supremand, not even coercive. Despite of all these scalar results, very little is known in the vectorial setting, up to some sufficient conditions and in particular cases (see [5,6,13,19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two references, analogous asymptotic analyses using Γconvergence techniques for functionals involving single phase elastic density can be found. Also in [1,2], where the authors obtain limit models under some differential constraints, involving supremal functions and A -quasiconvex envelopes. We mention also [7] where the authors obtained an L p approximation and a lower semicontinuity result for supremal functionals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%